The South Oaks Gambling Screen-revised Adolescent (SOGS-RA) revisited: a cut-point analysis
- PMID: 17180721
- DOI: 10.1007/s10899-006-9039-z
The South Oaks Gambling Screen-revised Adolescent (SOGS-RA) revisited: a cut-point analysis
Abstract
The lack of a criterion validity gold standard defining adolescent pathological gambling represents a major limitation of the adolescent gambling literature. The present study employed Receiver Operating Characteristic curve analysis (ROC) to examine the performance of the South Oaks Gambling Screen-Revised Adolescent (SOGS-RA) recommended cut-point of 4 against two-proxy gold standards: self-identified need for, or receipt of, help for gambling. Logistic regression analysis examined the correlates of self-identified need for help with gambling. The sample was comprised of 12990 adolescents from Atlantic Canada whose average age was 15 years and 50% of whom were male. The SOGS-RA performed as well or better with these proxy gold standards than with proxies used in previous studies. We concluded that the proxy gold standards based on self-identified need for or receipt of help represent a pragmatic solution to the lack of an adolescent-specific definition of problem or pathological gambling. Students in grade seven and SOGS-RA scores of 4 or greater were independent predictors of self-identifying a need for help.
Similar articles
-
Italian Adolescent Gambling Behaviour: Psychometric Evaluation of the South Oaks Gambling Screen: Revised for Adolescents (SOGS-RA) among a sample of Italian students.J Gambl Stud. 2014 Dec;30(4):789-801. doi: 10.1007/s10899-013-9385-6. J Gambl Stud. 2014. PMID: 23740346
-
Reliability, validity, and cut scores of the south oaks gambling screen (SOGS) for Chinese.J Gambl Stud. 2010 Mar;26(1):145-58. doi: 10.1007/s10899-009-9147-7. Epub 2009 Aug 13. J Gambl Stud. 2010. PMID: 19680794 Free PMC article.
-
The suitability of the South Oaks Gambling Screen-Revised for Adolescents (SOGS-RA) as a screening tool: IRT-based evidence.Psychol Addict Behav. 2013 Mar;27(1):287-93. doi: 10.1037/a0029987. Epub 2012 Oct 1. Psychol Addict Behav. 2013. PMID: 23025708
-
Prevalence of problem gambling in adolescents: findings from the 1999 Ontario Student Drug Use Survey.Can J Psychiatry. 2000 Oct;45(8):752-5. doi: 10.1177/070674370004500809. Can J Psychiatry. 2000. PMID: 11086559 Review.
-
A critical review of adolescent problem gambling assessment instruments.Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2010 Jan-Mar;22(1):77-93. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2010. PMID: 20491419 Review.
Cited by
-
Setting criterion thresholds for estimating prevalence: what is being validated?J Gambl Stud. 2014 Sep;30(3):577-607. doi: 10.1007/s10899-013-9380-y. J Gambl Stud. 2014. PMID: 23526052
-
Comparative Test Evaluation: Methods and Challenges.J Gambl Stud. 2018 Dec;34(4):1109-1138. doi: 10.1007/s10899-018-9745-3. J Gambl Stud. 2018. PMID: 29368061
-
Gambling behaviour in adolescents with learning disorders.J Gambl Stud. 2013 Jun;29(2):231-9. doi: 10.1007/s10899-012-9312-2. J Gambl Stud. 2013. PMID: 22573168
-
Psychometric Properties of the South Oaks Gambling Screen Revised for Adolescents in Chinese Adolescent Gamblers.Int J Public Health. 2022 Nov 17;67:1605182. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2022.1605182. eCollection 2022. Int J Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36466009 Free PMC article.
-
The validation of screening tests: meet the new screen same as the old screen?J Gambl Stud. 2012 Dec;28(4):573-605. doi: 10.1007/s10899-011-9285-6. J Gambl Stud. 2012. PMID: 22203270 Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical