Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2007 Jun;8(2):125-32.
doi: 10.1007/s11121-006-0056-z. Epub 2006 Dec 19.

Fidelity of implementation in Project Towards No Drug Abuse (TND): a comparison of classroom teachers and program specialists

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Fidelity of implementation in Project Towards No Drug Abuse (TND): a comparison of classroom teachers and program specialists

Louise A Rohrbach et al. Prev Sci. 2007 Jun.

Abstract

This paper presents the results of an effectiveness trial of Project Towards No Drug Abuse [TND], in which we compared program delivery by regular classroom teachers and program specialists within the same high schools. Within 18 schools that were randomly assigned to the program or control conditions, health classrooms were assigned to program delivery by teachers or (outside) specialists. Classroom sessions were observed by pairs of observers to assess three domains of implementation fidelity: adherence, classroom process, and perceived student acceptance of the program. Pre- and immediate posttest survey data were collected from 2331 students. Of the four composite indexes of implementation fidelity that were examined, only one (quality of delivery) showed a difference between specialists and teachers, with marginally higher ratings of specialists (p < .10). Both teachers and program specialists achieved effects on three of the five immediate outcome measures, including program-specific knowledge, addiction concern, and social self-control. Students' posttest ratings of the program overall and the quality of program delivery failed to reveal differences between the teacher- and specialist-led classrooms. These results suggest that motivated, trained classroom teachers can implement evidence-based prevention programs with fidelity and achieve immediate effects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Basen-Engquist K, O'Hara-Tompkins N, Lovato CY, Lewis MJ, Parcel GS, Gingiss P. The effect of two types of teacher training on implementation of smart choices: A tobacco prevention curriculum. Journal of School Health. 1994;64:334–339. - PubMed
    1. Botvin GJ, Baker E, Dusenbury L, Tortu S, Botvin EM. Preventing adolescent drug abuse through a multimodal cognitive-behavioral approach: Results of a 3-year study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1990;58:437–446. - PubMed
    1. Botvin GJ, Baker E, Dusenbury L, Botvin EM, Diaz T. Long-term follow-up results of a randomized drug abuse prevention trial in a white middle-class population. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1995;273:1106–1112. - PubMed
    1. Botvin GJ, Baker E, James-Ortiz S, Botvin EM, Kerner J. Smoking prevention among urban minority youth: Assessing effects on outcome and mediating variables. Health Psychology. 1992;11:290–299. - PubMed
    1. Cameron R, Brown KS, Best JA, Pelkman CL, Madill CL, Manske SR, Payne ME. Effectiveness of a social influences smoking prevention program as a function of provider type, training method, and school risk. American Journal of Public Health. 1999;89:1827–1831. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types