Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Sep-Oct;24(5):508-13.

Decreased ratio of circulatory vascular endothelial growth factor to endostatin in patients with systemic sclerosis--association with pulmonary involvement

Affiliations
  • PMID: 17181918

Decreased ratio of circulatory vascular endothelial growth factor to endostatin in patients with systemic sclerosis--association with pulmonary involvement

B Dziankowska-Bartkowiak et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2006 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Objective: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and endostatin appear to be involved in development of systemic sclerosis (SSc). We undertook this study to determine ratios of serum concentrations of VEGF to endostatin in SSc patients, healthy controls, assessments between cytokines, and lung-diffusing capacity (DLCO) as lung injury measurements related to interstitial lung disease (ILD).

Materials and methods: Serum VEGF and endostatin levels were measured with ELISA in 28 SSc patients (16 with lcSSc) and 20-matched healthy volunteers, evaluating correlation and balance. DLCO was corrected for hemoglobin, alveolar volume, and determined with a single breath technique.

Results: SSc serum concentrations (median; range) of endostatin were higher than controls (107.2; 13.6-261.2 vs. 77.8; 18.0-110.4 ng/ml, p < 0.05); VEGF levels did not differ (151.2; 4.5-836.4 vs. 286.4; 23.7-708.5 pg/ml, p < 0.05). Ratios of VEGF to endostatin were 2.6 and 3.6 times lower (p < 0.05) in SSc and dcSSc in comparison to healthy subjects. There were significant negative correlations between VEGF, endostatin in SSc (r = -0.51), and controls (r = -0.57). SSc with ILD (n = 20) had similar concentrations of VEGF, endostatin, and ratios of VEGF to endostatin compared to SSc alone. No correlations were seen between DLCO, VEGF, endostatin and their ratios in the whole SSc group. Negative correlations were noted between DLCO and VEGF (r = -0.82), with DLCO and the ratio of VEGF to endostatin (-0.62) in lcSSc with ILD (n = 10).

Conclusion: Decreased ratios of VEGF to endostatin may reflect imbalances between serum angiogenic, and anti-angiogenic activity in SSc, explaining impaired neoangiogenesis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources