Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Mar;81(5):2531-4.
doi: 10.1128/JVI.02169-06. Epub 2006 Dec 20.

Declining growth rate of West Nile virus in North America

Affiliations

Declining growth rate of West Nile virus in North America

Katherine W Snapinn et al. J Virol. 2007 Mar.

Abstract

To determine the demographic history of West Nile virus (WNV) in North America, we employed a coalescent method to envelope coding region data sets for the NY99 and WN02 genotypes. Although the observed genetic diversities in both genotypes were of approximately the same age, the mean rate of epidemiological growth of the WN02 population was approximately three times that of the NY99 population, a finding compatible with the recent dominance of the former genotype. However, there has also been a marked decrease in the recent growth rate of WN02, suggesting that WNV has reached its peak prevalence in North America.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
(a) Maximum a posteriori phylogenetic tree of 110 WN02 genotype viruses from samples obtained during the period from 2001 to 2005. For all branches, the times assigned to each tip correspond to the dates of sampling. (b) Bayesian skyline plot for the WN02 genotype. The bold line represents the median estimate of the effective number of infections through time, with the 95% HPD values shown in the shaded area. The effective number of infections, a measure of relative genetic diversity, is given as Neτ, where Ne is the effective population size and τ is the generation time. (c) Relative proportions of the NY99 and WN02 genotypes from 1999 to 2005 among the virus isolates analyzed in this study.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Davis, C. T., G. D. Ebel, R. S. Lanciotti, A. C. Brault, H. Guzman, M. Siirin, A. Lambert, R. E. Parsons, D. W. Beasley, R. J. Novak, D. Elizondo-Quiroga, E. N. Green, D. S. Young, L. M. Stark, M. A. Drebot, H. Artsob, R. B. Tesh, L. D. Kramer, and A. D. T. Barrett. 2005. Phylogenetic analysis of North American West Nile virus isolates, 2001-2004: evidence for the emergence of a dominant genotype. Virology 342:252-265. - PubMed
    1. Drummond, A. J., S. Y. W. Ho, M. J. Phillips, and A. Rambaut. 14 March 2006. Relaxed phylogenetics and dating with confidence. PLoS Biol. 4:e88. [Epub ahead of print.] - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ebel, G. D., J. Carricaburu, D. Young, K. A. Bernard, and L. D. Kramer. 2004. Genetic and phenotypic variation of West Nile virus in New York, 2000-2003. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 71:493-500. - PubMed
    1. Hanada, K., Y. Suzuki, and T. Gojobori. 2004. A large variation in the rates of synonymous substitution for RNA viruses and its relationship to a diversity of viral infection and transmission modes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:1074-1080. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hayes, E. B., N. Komar, R. S. Nasci, S. P. Montgomery, D. R. O'Leary, and G. L. Campbell. 2005. Epidemiology and transmission dynamics of West Nile virus disease. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 11:1167-1173. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data