Ertapenem versus cefotetan prophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery
- PMID: 17182989
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa054408
Ertapenem versus cefotetan prophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery
Abstract
Background: Ertapenem, a long-acting carbapenem, may be an alternative to the recommended prophylactic antibiotic cefotetan.
Methods: In this randomized, double-blind trial, we assessed the efficacy and safety of antibiotic prophylaxis with ertapenem, as compared with cefotetan, in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. A successful outcome was defined as the absence of surgical-site infection, anastomotic leakage, or antibiotic use 4 weeks postoperatively. All adverse events were collected until 14 days after the administration of antibiotic prophylaxis.
Results: Of the 1002 patients randomly assigned to study groups, 901 (451 in the ertapenem group and 450 in the cefotetan group) qualified for the modified intention-to-treat analysis, and 672 (338 in the ertapenem group and 334 in the cefotetan group) were included in the per-protocol analysis. After adjustment for strata, in the modified intention-to-treat analysis, the rate of overall prophylactic failure was 40.2% in the ertapenem group and 50.9% in the cefotetan group (absolute difference, -10.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -17.1 to -4.2); in the per-protocol analysis, the failure rate was 28.0% in the ertapenem group and 42.8% in the cefotetan group (absolute difference, -14.8%; 95% CI, -21.9 to -7.5). Both analyses fulfilled statistical criteria for the superiority of ertapenem. In the modified intention-to-treat analysis, the most common reason for failure of prophylaxis in both groups was surgical-site infection: 17.1% in the ertapenem group and 26.2% in the cefotetan group (absolute difference, -9.1; 95% CI, -14.4 to -3.7). In the treated population, the overall incidence of Clostridium difficile infection was 1.7% in the ertapenem group and 0.6% in the cefotetan group (P=0.22).
Conclusions: Ertapenem is more effective than cefotetan in the prevention of surgical-site infection in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery but may be associated with an increase in C. difficile infection. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00090272 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).
Copyright 2006 Massachusetts Medical Society.
Comment in
-
Carbapenems for surgical prophylaxis?N Engl J Med. 2006 Dec 21;355(25):2693-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe068258. N Engl J Med. 2006. PMID: 17182996 No abstract available.
-
Antibiotic prophylaxis in colorectal surgery.N Engl J Med. 2007 Apr 19;356(16):1684; author reply 1685. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc070105. N Engl J Med. 2007. PMID: 17442916 No abstract available.
-
Antibiotic prophylaxis in colorectal surgery.N Engl J Med. 2007 Apr 19;356(16):1685; author reply 1685. N Engl J Med. 2007. PMID: 17447286 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Comparative costs of ertapenem and cefotetan as prophylaxis for elective colorectal surgery.Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2008 Jun;9(3):349-56. doi: 10.1089/sur.2007.047. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2008. PMID: 18570576 Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of body mass index and ertapenem versus cefotetan prophylaxis on surgical site infection in elective colorectal surgery.Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2008 Apr;9(2):131-7. doi: 10.1089/sur.2007.034. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2008. PMID: 18426345 Clinical Trial.
-
Ertapenem prophylaxis of surgical site infections in elective colorectal surgery in China: a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study.J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014 Dec;69(12):3379-86. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku302. Epub 2014 Aug 23. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014. PMID: 25151205 Clinical Trial.
-
Association Between Preoperative Oral Antibiotics and the Incidence of Postoperative Clostridium difficile Infection in Adults Undergoing Elective Colorectal Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Dis Colon Rectum. 2020 Apr;63(4):545-561. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001619. Dis Colon Rectum. 2020. PMID: 32101994
-
Administration of parenteral prophylactic beta-lactam antibiotics in 2014: a review.Anesth Analg. 2015 Apr;120(4):877-87. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000468. Anesth Analg. 2015. PMID: 25790211 Review.
Cited by
-
Surgical Site Infection: The Clinical and Economic Impact.Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2019 May;32(3):157-165. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1677002. Epub 2019 Apr 2. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2019. PMID: 31061644 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Surgical glove perforation during laparoscopic colorectal procedures.Surg Endosc. 2022 May;36(5):3489-3494. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08670-0. Epub 2021 Aug 11. Surg Endosc. 2022. PMID: 34382122 Free PMC article.
-
Surgical site infections following colorectal cancer surgery: a randomized prospective trial comparing common and advanced antimicrobial dressing containing ionic silver.World J Surg Oncol. 2012 May 23;10:94. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-10-94. World J Surg Oncol. 2012. PMID: 22621779 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A colorectal "care bundle" to reduce surgical site infections in colorectal surgeries: a single-center experience.Perm J. 2012 Summer;16(3):10-6. doi: 10.7812/TPP/12.968. Perm J. 2012. PMID: 23012593 Free PMC article.
-
Antimicrobial prophylaxis in colorectal surgery: focus on ertapenem.Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2009;5:829-39. doi: 10.2147/tcrm.s3101. Epub 2009 Nov 2. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2009. PMID: 19898647 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical