Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Dec 21:7:103.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-7-103.

Neck ligament strength is decreased following whiplash trauma

Affiliations

Neck ligament strength is decreased following whiplash trauma

Yasuhiro Tominaga et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. .

Abstract

Background: Previous clinical studies have documented successful neck pain relief in whiplash patients using nerve block and radiofrequency ablation of facet joint afferents, including capsular ligament nerves. No previous study has documented injuries to the neck ligaments as determined by altered dynamic mechanical properties due to whiplash. The goal of the present study was to determine the dynamic mechanical properties of whiplash-exposed human cervical spine ligaments. Additionally, the present data were compared to previously reported control data. The ligaments included the anterior and posterior longitudinal, capsular, and interspinous and supraspinous ligaments, middle-third disc, and ligamentum flavum.

Methods: A total of 98 bone-ligament-bone specimens (C2-C3 to C7-T1) were prepared from six cervical spines following 3.5, 5, 6.5, and 8 g rear impacts and pre- and post-impact flexibility testing. The specimens were elongated to failure at a peak rate of 725 (SD 95) mm/s. Failure force, elongation, and energy absorbed, as well as stiffness were determined. The mechanical properties were statistically compared among ligaments, and to the control data (significance level: P < 0.05; trend: P < 0.1). The average physiological ligament elongation was determined using a mathematical model.

Results: For all whiplash-exposed ligaments, the average failure elongation exceeded the average physiological elongation. The highest average failure force of 204.6 N was observed in the ligamentum flavum, significantly greater than in middle-third disc and interspinous and supraspinous ligaments. The highest average failure elongation of 4.9 mm was observed in the interspinous and supraspinous ligaments, significantly greater than in the anterior longitudinal ligament, middle-third disc, and ligamentum flavum. The average energy absorbed ranged from 0.04 J by the middle-third disc to 0.44 J by the capsular ligament. The ligamentum flavum was the stiffest ligament, while the interspinous and supraspinous ligaments were most flexible. The whiplash-exposed ligaments had significantly lower (P = 0.036) failure force, 149.4 vs. 186.0 N, and a trend (P = 0.078) towards less energy absorption capacity, 308.6 vs. 397.0 J, as compared to the control data.

Conclusion: The present decreases in neck ligament strength due to whiplash provide support for the ligament-injury hypothesis of whiplash syndrome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic of a bone-ligament-bone preparation from Ivancic et al [19]. Anchoring plates ensured mid-substance tears during elongation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic of the experimental apparatus from Ivancic et al [19]. Air flow controlled via the solenoid valve caused movement of the piston rod, and therefore ligament elongation. Force was measured by a load cell and elongation by a Hall effect sensor positioned between two magnets.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Ligament force vs. elongation curves, including the average physiological elongation shown by a vertical dashed line, and the physiological ligament elongation range (average ± SD), indicated by grey shading. The ligaments included A) anterior longitudinal ligament (ALL), B) middle-third disc (MTD), C) posterior longitudinal ligament (PLL), D) capsular ligament (CL), E) ligamentum flavum (LF), and F) interspinous and supraspinous ligaments (ISL+SSL).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lovell ME, Galasko CS. Whiplash disorders--a review. Injury. 2002;33:97–101. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(01)00111-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Freeman MD, Croft AC, Rossignol AM, Weaver DS, Reiser M. A review and methodologic critique of the literature refuting whiplash syndrome. Spine. 1999;24:86–96. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199901010-00022. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sterner Y, Gerdle B. Acute and chronic whiplash disorders--a review. J Rehabil Med. 2004;36:193–209; quiz 210. doi: 10.1080/16501970410030742. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Spitzer WO, Skovron ML, Salmi LR, Cassidy JD, Duranceau J, Suissa S, Zeiss E. Scientific monograph of the Quebec Task Force on Whiplash-Associated Disorders: redefining "whiplash" and its management. Spine. 1995;20:1S–73S. - PubMed
    1. Kasch H, Bach FW, Jensen TS. Handicap after acute whiplash injury: a 1-year prospective study of risk factors. Neurology. 2001;56:1637–1643. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms