Bench-to-bedside review: human subjects research--are more standards needed?
- PMID: 17184560
- PMCID: PMC1794482
- DOI: 10.1186/cc5114
Bench-to-bedside review: human subjects research--are more standards needed?
Abstract
There are many controversial issues surrounding ethics in study design and conduct of human subjects research. In this review we briefly touch on the origin of ethics in clinical research and how the current regulations and standards came into practice. We then discuss current controversies regarding informed consent, conflicts of interest, institutional review boards, and other relevant issues such as innovative procedures and quality improvement projects. The question of whether we need more standards is a very important yet challenging one to which there is no simple answer. We address this question by reviewing and commenting on relevant literature. We conclude that what is needed are not more standards per se, but rather refinement and uniformity of current standards, and their interpretation and application both to protect human subjects and to advance medicine.
Comment in
-
Research in critically ill patients: standards of informed consent.Crit Care. 2007;11(1):110. doi: 10.1186/cc5678. Crit Care. 2007. PMID: 17316457 Free PMC article.
Similar articles
-
Protecting human subjects: how much responsibility falls to editorial boards?Am J Ind Med. 2009 Feb;52(2):172-5. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20652. Am J Ind Med. 2009. PMID: 19016264
-
Bioethics in the Oversight of Clinical Research: Institutional Review Boards and Data and Safety Monitoring Boards.Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2019;29(1):33-49. doi: 10.1353/ken.2019.0009. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2019. PMID: 31080176
-
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29. J Clin Oncol. 2003. PMID: 12721281
-
Institutional Review Boards: What Clinician Researchers Need to Know.Mayo Clin Proc. 2019 Mar;94(3):515-525. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.01.020. Mayo Clin Proc. 2019. PMID: 30832791 Review.
-
Informed consent in experimentation involving mentally impaired persons: ethical issues.Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2010;46(4):411-21. doi: 10.4415/ANN_10_04_09. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2010. PMID: 21169673 Review.
Cited by
-
Challenges and opportunities in pain management disparities research: implications for clinical practice, advocacy, and policy.J Pain. 2012 Jul;13(7):611-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2012.02.004. Epub 2012 May 2. J Pain. 2012. PMID: 22560002 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Molecular and immunological tools for the evaluation of the cellular immune response in the neotropical monkey Saimiri sciureus, a non-human primate model for malaria research.Malar J. 2015 Apr 18;14:166. doi: 10.1186/s12936-015-0688-1. Malar J. 2015. PMID: 25927834 Free PMC article.
-
Changes in the institutional review board submission process for multicenter research over 6 years.Nurs Outlook. 2010 Jul-Aug;58(4):181-7. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2010.04.003. Nurs Outlook. 2010. PMID: 20637931 Free PMC article.
-
Research in critically ill patients: standards of informed consent.Crit Care. 2007;11(1):110. doi: 10.1186/cc5678. Crit Care. 2007. PMID: 17316457 Free PMC article.
References
-
- National Institute of Health NIH funding opportunities and notices http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-06-043.html
-
- Rosenthal E. When drug trials go horribly wrong. International Herald Tribune. http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/04/07/news/drug.php 9 April 2006.
-
- US Government Printing Office . Reprinted in: Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1949. The Nuremberg Code; pp. 181–182.
-
- Diekema DS. Conducting ethical research in pediatric emergency medicine. Clin Pediatr Emerg Med. 2003;4:273–284. doi: 10.1016/S1522-8401(03)00071-5. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources