Does ambivalence about becoming pregnant explain social class differentials in use of contraception?
- PMID: 17185329
- DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckl263
Does ambivalence about becoming pregnant explain social class differentials in use of contraception?
Abstract
Background: Manual social class background has consistently been associated with markers of poorer sexual health. This study of adults examines contraceptive use across social classes and the role of ambiguity towards pregnancy in non-use.
Method: A nationally representative sample of Irish men and women aged 18-45 years were surveyed (n = 3317). Use of contraception in the last year and at the last occasion of vaginal sexual intercourse was queried. Reasons for non-use were examined.
Results: The consistency of contraceptive use in the last year was higher among women than men with lower use in unskilled manual social classes for both sexes. 'Not having planned for sex' was the most commonly cited reason for non-use (47% of men and 40% of women). 'Not caring if pregnancy occurred' was cited by 11% of women and 12% of men, while 'took a chance' was cited by 8% of both men and women. Results showed semi and unskilled manual women more likely to report that sex was unplanned or that they 'took a chance'. Among men, all other classes were more likely to report each of the ambivalence statements than the professional and managerial class.
Conclusions: The study provides evidence of social class differentials in use of contraception among adults, and shows that these may be due, in part, to higher levels of ambivalence about pregnancy among working class women. The article adds to the socio-demographic literature on class differentials in unwanted pregnancy and extends research on adolescents to cover patterns for adult women and men.
Similar articles
-
Improving contraceptive use in the United States.Issues Brief (Alan Guttmacher Inst). 2008;(1):1-8. Issues Brief (Alan Guttmacher Inst). 2008. PMID: 18561392
-
Contraception and pregnancy then and now: examining the experiences of a cohort of mid-age Australian women.Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009 Aug;49(4):429-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2009.01031.x. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009. PMID: 19694702
-
Young adults' contraceptive knowledge, norms and attitudes: associations with risk of unintended pregnancy.Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012 Jun;44(2):107-16. doi: 10.1363/4410712. Epub 2012 May 8. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012. PMID: 22681426
-
Reasons for unprotected intercourse in adult women.J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2007 Apr;16(3):302-10. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2007.0210. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2007. PMID: 17439376 Review.
-
Why do women experience untimed pregnancies? A review of contraceptive failure rates.Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2010 Aug;24(4):443-55. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2010.02.002. Epub 2010 Mar 23. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2010. PMID: 20335073 Review.
Cited by
-
Conceptualizing Childbearing Ambivalence: A Social and Dynamic Perspective.J Marriage Fam. 2018 Aug;80(4):888-901. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12489. Epub 2018 May 9. J Marriage Fam. 2018. PMID: 30270937 Free PMC article.
-
Pregnancy ambivalence and contraceptive use among young adults in the United States.Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012 Dec;44(4):236-43. doi: 10.1363/4423612. Epub 2012 Oct 10. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012. PMID: 23231331 Free PMC article.
-
Patient characteristics associated with pregnancy ambivalence.J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2015 Jan;24(1):37-41. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2014.4924. Epub 2014 Dec 2. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2015. PMID: 25454635 Free PMC article.
-
Do perceptions of their partners' childbearing desires affect young women's pregnancy risk? Further study of ambivalence.Popul Stud (Camb). 2017 Mar;71(1):101-116. doi: 10.1080/00324728.2016.1253858. Epub 2016 Nov 29. Popul Stud (Camb). 2017. PMID: 27897080 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical