Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2007 Jul;16(7):919-24.
doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0283-9. Epub 2006 Dec 21.

Substantial sick-leave costs savings due to a graded activity intervention for workers with non-specific sub-acute low back pain

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Substantial sick-leave costs savings due to a graded activity intervention for workers with non-specific sub-acute low back pain

Hynek Hlobil et al. Eur Spine J. 2007 Jul.

Abstract

The objective of this study is to compare the costs and benefits of a graded activity (GA) intervention to usual care (UC) for sick-listed workers with non-specific low back pain (LBP). The study is a single-blind, randomized controlled trial with 3-year follow-up. A total of 134 (126 men and 8 women) predominantly blue-collar workers, sick-listed due to LBP were recruited and randomly assigned to either GA (N = 67; mean age 39 +/- 9 years) or to UC (N = 67; mean age 37 +/- 8 years). The main outcome measures were the costs of health care utilization during the first follow-up year and the costs of productivity loss during the second and the third follow-up year. At the end of the first follow-up year an average investment for the GA intervention of 475 euros per worker, only 83 euros more than health care utilization costs in UC group, yielded an average savings of at least 999 euros (95% CI: -1,073; 3,115) due to a reduction in productivity loss. The potential cumulative savings were an average of 1,661 euros (95% CI: -4,154; 6,913) per worker over a 3-year follow-up period. It may be concluded that the GA intervention for non-specific LBP is a cost-beneficial return-to-work intervention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart of the participants and dropouts during the 3-year follow-up period. Asterisk indicates number of workers

References

    1. Courtney TK, Matz S, Webster BS. Disabling occupational injury in the US construction industry, 1996. J Occup Environ Med. 2002;44:1161–1168. doi: 10.1097/00043764-200212000-00010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dutch Central Organisation for Health Care Charge, Utrecht (1998) Tariffs for medical specialist, excluding psychiatrists. Supplement to tariffs decision number 5600-1900-1 from 10 December 1998 [in Dutch: Het tariefboek voor medisch specialist, exclusief psychiaters. De bijlage bij tariefbeschikking 5600-1900-1 d.d. 10 december 1998]
    1. Elders LA, Burdorf A. Prevalence, incidence, and recurrence of low back pain in scaffolders during a 3-year follow-up study. Spine. 2004;29:101–106. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000115125.60331.72. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Elders LA, Beek AJ, Burdorf A. Return to work after sickness absence due to back disorders—a systematic review on intervention strategies. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2000;73:339–348. doi: 10.1007/s004200000127. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gatchel RJ, Polatin PB, Noe C, Gardea M, Pulliam C, Thompson J. Treatment- and cost-effectiveness of early intervention for acute low-back pain patients: a one-year prospective study. J Occup Rehabil. 2003;13:1–9. doi: 10.1023/A:1021823505774. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types