Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2006 Nov-Dec;16(6):361-71.
doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2006.07.001.

Diabetes care among veteran women with disability

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Diabetes care among veteran women with disability

Chin-Lin Tseng et al. Womens Health Issues. 2006 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Objective: The primary objective of this study was to analyze predictors of diabetes care consistent with performance standards among women Veterans Health Administration (VHA) clinic users with disability enrollment status.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study using VHA and Medicare files of VHA clinic users with diabetes. Diabetes care measures consisted of annual testing for hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and poor HbA(1c) (>9%) and LDL-C (> or =130 mg/dL) control in fiscal year 2000. Chi-square tests and logistic regressions were used to assess subgroup differences in diabetes care. Independent variables included demographic characteristics and physical and psychiatric comorbidities.

Population: Study population was based on veteran women <65 years of age who used VHA clinics; we identified 2,344 women as having coexisting disability and diabetes and 2,766 women with diabetes and without disability.

Findings: Among veteran women with diabetes and disability, 65% received > or =1 HbA(1c) test, and 54% received a LDL-C test; 25% and 30% had poor HbA(1c) and LDL-C control, respectively. In logistic regressions, none of the independent variables had significant effects on poor HbA(1c) or LDL-C control, except that African Americans were more likely to have poor HbA(1c) control than whites. Significant age effects were noted in rates of HbA(1c) and LDL testing. Comparison of diabetes care measures between women with and without disability indicated that those with disability were more likely to receive HbA(1c) and LDL-C tests; no significant differences in HbA(1c) and LDL-C control were noted.

Conclusions: Disability status of women veterans was not a barrier to diabetes care consistent with performance standards. Our findings suggest that to improve diabetes care, subgroup-specific interventions, rather than a global approach, are warranted.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adams AS, Zhang F, Mah C, Grant RW, Kleinman K, Meigs JB, et al. Race differences in long-term diabetes management in an HMO. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:2844–2849. - PubMed
    1. Altman BM. Definitions, models, classifications, and applications. In: Albrecht GL, Seelman KD, Bury M, editors. Handbook of disability studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2001.
    1. American Diabetes Association (ADA) Medical management of non-insulin-dependent (type 2) diabetes. 3. Alexandria, VA: Author; 1995.
    1. Arday DR, Fleming BB, Keller DK, Pendergrass PW, Vaughn RJ, Turpin JM, et al. Variation in diabetes care among states: Do patient characteristics matter? Diabetes Care. 2002;25:2230–2237. - PubMed
    1. Blaum CS, Volpato S, Cappola AR, Chaves P, Xue QL, Guralnik JM, et al. Diabetes, hyperglycaemia and mortality in disabled older women: The Women’s Health and Ageing Study I. Diabetic Medicine. 2005;22:543–550. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms