Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2007 Jan;150(1):31-36.e6.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.09.033.

Pre-type 1 diabetes dysmetabolism: maximal sensitivity achieved with both oral and intravenous glucose tolerance testing

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Pre-type 1 diabetes dysmetabolism: maximal sensitivity achieved with both oral and intravenous glucose tolerance testing

Jennifer M Barker et al. J Pediatr. 2007 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the relationship of intravenous (IVGTT) and oral (OGTT) glucose tolerance tests abnormalities to diabetes development in a high-risk pre-diabetic cohort and to identify an optimal testing strategy for detecting preclinical diabetes.

Study design: Diabetes Prevention Trial-Type 1 Diabetes (DPT-1) randomized subjects to oral (n = 372) and parenteral (n = 339) insulin prevention trials. Subjects were followed with IVGTTs and OGTTs. Factors associated with progression to diabetes were evaluated.

Results: Survival analysis revealed that higher quartiles of 2-hour glucose and lower quartiles of first phase insulin response (FPIR) at baseline were associated with decreased diabetes-free survival. Cox proportional hazards modeling showed that baseline body mass index (BMI), FPIR, and 2-hour glucose levels were significantly associated with an increased hazard for diabetes. On testing performed within 6 months of diabetes diagnosis, 3% (1/32) had normal FPIR and normal 2-hour glucose on OGTT. The sensitivities for impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and low FPIR performed within 6 months of diabetes diagnosis were equivalent (76% vs 73%).

Conclusions: Most (97%) subjects had abnormal IVGTTs and/or OGTTs before the development of diabetes. The highest sensitivity is achieved using both tests.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A: Time to diabetes by quartile of 2-hour glucose on oral glucose tolerance testing in the Oral Insulin Prevention Trial. Subjects in the highest quartile of 2-hour glucose had a shorter diabetes free survival time compared with subjects in the lowest quartile, (p=0.0006). Quartile 1: 44 mg/dl – 92mg/dL; Quartile 2: 93mg/dL – 108 mg/dL, Quartile 3: 108 mg/dL – 120 mg/dL; Quartile 4: 121 mg/dL – 139 mg/dL. B: Time to diabetes by quartile of 2-hour glucose on oral glucose tolerance testing in the Parenteral Insulin Prevention Trial. Subjects in the highest quartile of 2-hour glucose had a shorter diabetes free survival time compared with subjects in the lowest quartile (p<0.0001). Quartile 1: 40 mg/dl – 102 mg/dL; Quartile 2: 103 mg/dL – 119mg/dL, Quartile 3: 120 mg/dL – 147 mg/dL; Quartile 4: 148mg/dL – 199 mg/dL. C: Time to diabetes by quartile of first phase insulin response on intravenous glucose tolerance testing in the Parenteral Insulin Prevention Trial. Subjects in the lowest quartile of FPIR had a shorter diabetes free survival time compared with subjects in the highest quartile, (p<0.0001). Quartile 1: 8.3 μU/mL – 52 μU/mL; Quartile 2: 53 μU/mL L – 73 μU/mL, Quartile 3: 74 μU/mL – 102 μU/mL; Quartile 4: 103 μU/mL – 325 μU/mL.
Figure 1
Figure 1
A: Time to diabetes by quartile of 2-hour glucose on oral glucose tolerance testing in the Oral Insulin Prevention Trial. Subjects in the highest quartile of 2-hour glucose had a shorter diabetes free survival time compared with subjects in the lowest quartile, (p=0.0006). Quartile 1: 44 mg/dl – 92mg/dL; Quartile 2: 93mg/dL – 108 mg/dL, Quartile 3: 108 mg/dL – 120 mg/dL; Quartile 4: 121 mg/dL – 139 mg/dL. B: Time to diabetes by quartile of 2-hour glucose on oral glucose tolerance testing in the Parenteral Insulin Prevention Trial. Subjects in the highest quartile of 2-hour glucose had a shorter diabetes free survival time compared with subjects in the lowest quartile (p<0.0001). Quartile 1: 40 mg/dl – 102 mg/dL; Quartile 2: 103 mg/dL – 119mg/dL, Quartile 3: 120 mg/dL – 147 mg/dL; Quartile 4: 148mg/dL – 199 mg/dL. C: Time to diabetes by quartile of first phase insulin response on intravenous glucose tolerance testing in the Parenteral Insulin Prevention Trial. Subjects in the lowest quartile of FPIR had a shorter diabetes free survival time compared with subjects in the highest quartile, (p<0.0001). Quartile 1: 8.3 μU/mL – 52 μU/mL; Quartile 2: 53 μU/mL L – 73 μU/mL, Quartile 3: 74 μU/mL – 102 μU/mL; Quartile 4: 103 μU/mL – 325 μU/mL.
Figure 1
Figure 1
A: Time to diabetes by quartile of 2-hour glucose on oral glucose tolerance testing in the Oral Insulin Prevention Trial. Subjects in the highest quartile of 2-hour glucose had a shorter diabetes free survival time compared with subjects in the lowest quartile, (p=0.0006). Quartile 1: 44 mg/dl – 92mg/dL; Quartile 2: 93mg/dL – 108 mg/dL, Quartile 3: 108 mg/dL – 120 mg/dL; Quartile 4: 121 mg/dL – 139 mg/dL. B: Time to diabetes by quartile of 2-hour glucose on oral glucose tolerance testing in the Parenteral Insulin Prevention Trial. Subjects in the highest quartile of 2-hour glucose had a shorter diabetes free survival time compared with subjects in the lowest quartile (p<0.0001). Quartile 1: 40 mg/dl – 102 mg/dL; Quartile 2: 103 mg/dL – 119mg/dL, Quartile 3: 120 mg/dL – 147 mg/dL; Quartile 4: 148mg/dL – 199 mg/dL. C: Time to diabetes by quartile of first phase insulin response on intravenous glucose tolerance testing in the Parenteral Insulin Prevention Trial. Subjects in the lowest quartile of FPIR had a shorter diabetes free survival time compared with subjects in the highest quartile, (p<0.0001). Quartile 1: 8.3 μU/mL – 52 μU/mL; Quartile 2: 53 μU/mL L – 73 μU/mL, Quartile 3: 74 μU/mL – 102 μU/mL; Quartile 4: 103 μU/mL – 325 μU/mL.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A: First phase insulin response over time to diabetes including all subjects who developed diabetes and all intravenous glucose tolerance tests. B: Fasting glucose over time to diabetes, including all subjects who developed diabetes and all oral glucose tolerance tests. C: 2-hour glucose over time to diabetes, including all subjects who developed diabetes and all oral glucose tolerance tests.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A: First phase insulin response over time to diabetes including all subjects who developed diabetes and all intravenous glucose tolerance tests. B: Fasting glucose over time to diabetes, including all subjects who developed diabetes and all oral glucose tolerance tests. C: 2-hour glucose over time to diabetes, including all subjects who developed diabetes and all oral glucose tolerance tests.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A: First phase insulin response over time to diabetes including all subjects who developed diabetes and all intravenous glucose tolerance tests. B: Fasting glucose over time to diabetes, including all subjects who developed diabetes and all oral glucose tolerance tests. C: 2-hour glucose over time to diabetes, including all subjects who developed diabetes and all oral glucose tolerance tests.

References

    1. Lendrum R, Walker G, Gamble DR. Islet-cell antibodies in juvenile diabetes mellitus of recent onset. Lancet. 1975;7912:880–883. - PubMed
    1. Bottazzo GF, Dean BM, Gorsuch AN, Cudworth AG, Doniach D. Complement-fixing islet-cell antibodies in type I diabetes: possible monitors of active beta-cell damage. Lancet. 1980;8170:668–672. - PubMed
    1. Verge CF, Stenger D, Bonifacio E, Colman PG, Pilcher C, Bingley PJ, Eisenbarth GS. Combined use of autoantibodies (IA-2 autoantibody, GAD autoantibody, insulin autoantibody, cytoplasmic islet cell antibodies) in type 1 diabetes: Combinatorial Islet Autoantibody Workshop. Diabetes. 1998;47:1857–1866. - PubMed
    1. Yu L, Robles D, Rewers M, Kaur P, Keleman K, Eisenbarth GS. High-throughput insulin autoantibody assay: 96 well filtration plate format. Diabetes. 1999;48:A213.
    1. Gardner SG, Gale EA, Williams AJ, Gillespie KM, Lawrence KE, Bottazzo GF, Bingley PJ. Progression to diabetes in relatives with islet autoantibodies. Is it inevitable? Diabetes care. 1999;22:2049–2054. - PubMed

Publication types