Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2006 Dec 31;47(6):799-804.
doi: 10.3349/ymj.2006.47.6.799.

The CobraPLA during anesthesia with controlled ventilation: a clinical trial of efficacy

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

The CobraPLA during anesthesia with controlled ventilation: a clinical trial of efficacy

Sang Beom Nam et al. Yonsei Med J. .

Abstract

The CobraPLA (CPLA) is a relatively new supraglottic airway device that has not been sufficiently investigated. Here, we performed a prospective observational study to evaluate the efficacy of the CPLA during controlled ventilation. In 50 anesthetized and paralyzed patients undergoing elective surgery a CPLA was inserted and inflated to an intracuff pressure of 60 cm H2O. The success rate of insertion upon the first attempt was 82% (41/50), with a mean insertion time of 16.3 +/- 4.5 seconds. The adequacy of ventilation was assessed by observing the end tidal CO2 waveform, movement of the chest wall, peak airway pressure (13.5 cm H2O), and leak fraction (4%). We documented the airway sealing pressure (22.5 cm H2O) and noted that the the site of gas leaks at that pressure were either at the neck (52%), the abdomen (46%), or both (2%). In 44 (88%) patients, the vocal cords were visible in the fiberoptic view through the CPLA. There was no gastric insufflation during the anesthesia. Respiratory and hemodynamic parameters remained stable during CPLA insertion. Postoperative blood staining of CPLA was minimal, occurring in 22% (11/50) of patients. Mild and moderate throat soreness was reported in 44% (22/50) and 4% (2/50) of patients, respectively. Lastly, mild dysphonia was observed in 6% (3/50) of patients and mild dysphagia in 10% (5/50) of patients. Our results indicated that the CPLA is both easy to place and allows adequate ventilation during controlled ventilation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The CobraPLA™.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Changes in intracuff pressure throughout the experiment with CobraPLA™. Data are given as mean ± SD.

Similar articles

References

    1. Brain AI. The laryngeal mask - a new concept in airway management. Br J Anaesth. 1983;55:801–805. - PubMed
    1. Brain AI. Three cases of difficult intubation overcome by the laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia. 1985;40:353–355. - PubMed
    1. Frass M, Frenzer R, Rauscha F, Weber H, Pacher R, Leithner C. Evaluation of esophageal tracheal combitube in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Crit Care Med. 1987;15:609–611. - PubMed
    1. Devitt JH, Wenstone R, Noel AG, O'Donnell MP. The laryngeal mask airway and positive-pressure ventilation. Anesthesiology. 1994;80:550–555. - PubMed
    1. Cook TM, McKinstry C, Hardy R, Twigg S. Randomized crossover comparison of the ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway with the Laryngeal Tube® during anaesthesia with controlled ventilation. Br J Anaesth. 2003;91:678–683. - PubMed

Publication types