Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2006 Dec 31;47(6):892-5.
doi: 10.3349/ymj.2006.47.6.892.

Non-surgical treatment of vaginal agenesis using a simplified version of Ingram's method

Affiliations
Case Reports

Non-surgical treatment of vaginal agenesis using a simplified version of Ingram's method

Mee-Hwa Lee. Yonsei Med J. .

Abstract

Non-surgical vaginal dilation is a safe and effective method for the creation of neovagina in the patient with vaginal agenesis. Compared to surgical methods, non-surgical vaginal dilation has the advantage of low morbidity, the creation of a more physiologic vaginal milieu, and no surgical scarring. To overcome some technical limitations of original Frank's method, in 1981 Ingram proposed a modification of the technique that used dilators of gradually increasing size mounted on a bicycle seat stool. Although several studies have shown satisfactory outcomes using Ingram's method, there are some practical difficulties in making and handling the bicycle seat stool. This article reports a case of a 24-year-old woman with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome whose vaginal agenesis is successfully treated with a simplified version of Ingram's method. This method uses dilators of gradually increasing size mounted on an ordinary chair instead of a bicycle seat stool. When necessary, the patient may use a fulcrum under the dilator.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Pelvic MR image shows complete agenesis of the vagina (short arrow) and suggests the presence of a rudimentary uterus (2-cm diameter) (long arrow).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The acrylic dilators. Among the three sets of dilators, the first two sets (diameters of 1.5 cm and 2.5 cm) were used in this patient.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
A bicycle seat stool (A) and an ordinary chair (B). The photo of the ordinary chair is shown as an example, but was not the chair used in our study.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Evans TN, Poland ML, Boving RL. Vaginal malformations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981;141:910–920. - PubMed
    1. Frank RT. The formation of an artificial vagina without operation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1938;35:1053–1055.
    1. Roberts CP, Haber MJ, Rock JA. Vaginal creation for müllerian agenesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:1349–1352. - PubMed
    1. Edmonds DK. Vaginal and uterine anomalies in the paediatric and adolescent patient. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2001;13:463–467. - PubMed
    1. Costa EM, Mendonca BB, Inacio M, Arnhold IJ, Silva FA, Lodovici O. Management of ambiguous genitalia in pseudohermaphrodites: new perspectives on vaginal dilation. Fertil Steril. 1997;67:229–232. - PubMed

Publication types