Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Mar;45(3):902-5.
doi: 10.1128/JCM.01573-06. Epub 2006 Dec 27.

Distinct antimicrobial resistance patterns and antimicrobial resistance-harboring genes according to genomic species of Acinetobacter isolates

Affiliations

Distinct antimicrobial resistance patterns and antimicrobial resistance-harboring genes according to genomic species of Acinetobacter isolates

Yu Mi Lim et al. J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Mar.

Abstract

Using 58 isolates of Acinetobacter species recovered from a university hospital between August 2004 and March 2005, we performed genomic identification by amplified rRNA gene restriction analysis (ARDRA) and investigated the existence of metallo-beta-lactamase (MBL) producers and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producers. Genomic species identification of Acinetobacter strains using ARDRA showed that 40 strains were genomic species 2 (Acinetobacter baumannii), 9 were 13 sensu Tjernberg and Ursing (13TU), 5 were Acinetobacter phenon 6/ct 13TU, and 4 were Acinetobacter genospecies 3. Among 58 strains, 13 isolates were MBL producers carrying bla(IMP-1) or bla(VIM-2) and 13 isolates were ESBL producers carrying bla(PER-1). Notably, the MBL producers were mostly 13TU, Acinetobacter phenon 6/ct 13TU, and Acinetobacter genospecies 3, which showed susceptibility to ciprofloxacin and ampicillin-sulbactam. However, 12 of 13 strains carrying bla(PER-1) were A. baumannii, showing multidrug resistance. The data revealed that the antimicrobial resistance patterns and resistance-harboring genes of Acinetobacter species are remarkably distinct according to the genomic species of Acinetobacter isolates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bernards, A. T., J. van der Toorn, C. P. A. van Boven, and L. Dijkshoorn. 1996. Evaluation of the ability of the API20NE system to identify Acinetobacter genomic species. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 15:303-308. - PubMed
    1. Bouvet, P. J. M., and P. A. D. Grimont. 1987. Identification and biotyping of clinical isolates of Acinetobacter. Ann. Inst. Pasteur Microbiol. 138:569-578. - PubMed
    1. Dijkshoorn, L., B. van Harsselaar, I. Tjernberg, P. J. M. Bouvet, and M. Vaneechoutte. 1998. Evaluation of amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis for identification of Acinetobacter genomic species. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 21:33-39. - PubMed
    1. Gautom, R. K. 1997. Rapid pulsed-field gel electrophoresis protocol for typing of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and other gram-negative organisms in 1 day. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:2977-2980. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gerner-Smidt, P., and I. Tjernberg. 1993. Acinetobacter in Denmark. I. Taxonomy, antibiotic susceptibility, and pathogenicity of 112 clinical strains. Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Immunol. Scand. 101:815-825. - PubMed

MeSH terms