Modulation of calcium-dependent and -independent acetylcholine release from motor nerve endings

Abstract

Inhibition of acetylcholine (ACh) release by adenosine is an important mechanism by which the secretory apparatus is regulated at both mammalian (Ginsborg and Hirst, 1972; Hirsh et al., 2002; Silinsky, 2004) and amphibian (Silinsky, 1980; Silinsky and Solsona, 1992; Redman and Silinsky, 1993, 1994; Robitaille et al., 1999) neuromuscular junctions (NMJs). ACh is known to be costored with ATP in cholinergic vesicles (Zimmermann, 1994), and it has been demonstrated that at amphibian NMJs, adenosine derived from neurally released ATPis the mediator of neuromuscular depression exhibited at low frequencies of nerve stimulation (Redman and Silinsky, 1994) (Fig. 1). At the mouse motor nerve ending the inhibitory actions of adenosine on transmitter release are linked to a reduction in the nerve-terminal calcium current associated with neurotransmitter release (Silinsky, 2004). In contrast, at the frog motor nerve, inhibition of ACh release by adenosine occurs in the absence of any effect on nerve-terminal calcium currents (Silinsky and Solsona, 1992; Redman and Silinsky, 1994; Robitaille et al., 1999). That is, at the frog NMJ adenosine inhibits ACh release through an effect on a process that takes place downstream from calcium entry. Although the exact site at which adenosine inhibits transmitter release is unknown, both the speed (50-100 ms; E. M. Silinsky, unpublished observations) and the stimulation-independent nature of inhibition suggest that this process must occur through an action on vesicles that are already primed and ready for release. Thus, the likely sites for mediating the action of adenosine are those core components of the neurotransmitter release process, the three SNARES (SNAP-25, syntaxin, and synaptobrevin), and synaptotagmin. However, there are difficulties in addressing which of these individual elements of the secretory apparatus might be involved in the actions of adenosine. We could use fractions of botulinum toxin to eliminate individual components of the secretory apparatus. However, each of these core components of the release machinery is individually essential for the neurotransmitter release process. Therefore, we decided to approach this problem by alternative means.