The effect of telephone versus print tailoring for mammography adherence
- PMID: 17196358
- PMCID: PMC1858664
- DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.09.014
The effect of telephone versus print tailoring for mammography adherence
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this intervention was to increase mammography adherence in women who had not had a mammogram in the last 15 months.
Methods: A prospective randomized intervention trial used four groups: (1) usual care, (2) tailored telephone counseling, (3) tailored print, (4) tailored telephone counseling and print. Participants included a total of 1244 women from two sites-a general medicine clinic setting serving predominately low-income clientele and a Health Maintenance Organization (HMO). Computer-tailored interventions addressed each woman's perceived risk of breast cancer, benefits and/or barriers and self-efficacy related to mammography screening comparing delivery by telephone and mail.
Results: Compared to usual care all intervention groups increased mammography adherence significantly (odds ratio 1.60-1.91) when the entire sample was included.
Conclusions: All interventions groups demonstrated efficacy in increasing mammography adherence as compared to a usual care group. When the intervention analysis considered baseline stage, pre contemplators (women who did not intend to get a mammogram) did not significantly increase in mammography adherence as compared to usual care.
Practice implications: Women who are in pre contemplation stage may need a more intensive intervention.
Similar articles
-
Can tailored interventions increase mammography use among HMO women?Am J Prev Med. 2000 Jan;18(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(99)00106-3. Am J Prev Med. 2000. PMID: 10808977 Clinical Trial.
-
A cost-effectiveness comparison of three tailored interventions to increase mammography screening.J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2004 Oct;13(8):909-18. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2004.13.909. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2004. PMID: 15671706 Clinical Trial.
-
The impact of tailored interventions on a community health center population.Patient Educ Couns. 1999 Jun;37(2):125-40. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(98)00122-0. Patient Educ Couns. 1999. PMID: 14528540 Clinical Trial.
-
Cost-effectiveness analysis of interventions to enhance mammography compliance using computer modeling (CAN*TROL).Value Health. 2004 Mar-Apr;7(2):175-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2004.72326.x. Value Health. 2004. PMID: 15164807 Review.
-
Tailored interventions to promote mammography screening: a meta-analytic review.Prev Med. 2007 Oct;45(4):252-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.06.009. Epub 2007 Jun 23. Prev Med. 2007. PMID: 17643481 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Why are Tailored Messages More Effective? A Multiple Mediation Analysis of a Breast Cancer Screening Intervention.J Commun. 2012 Oct;62(5):851-868. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01668.x. J Commun. 2012. PMID: 26405350 Free PMC article.
-
Enhancing informed choice to undergo health screening: a systematic review.Am J Health Behav. 2013 May;37(3):351-9. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.37.3.8. Am J Health Behav. 2013. PMID: 23985182 Free PMC article.
-
Interventions to increase the uptake of mammography amongst low income women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e55574. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055574. Epub 2013 Feb 22. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23451028 Free PMC article.
-
Regularized outcome weighted subgroup identification for differential treatment effects.Biometrics. 2015 Sep;71(3):645-53. doi: 10.1111/biom.12322. Epub 2015 May 11. Biometrics. 2015. PMID: 25962845 Free PMC article.
-
Challenges in tailored intervention research.Nurs Outlook. 2010 Mar-Apr;58(2):104-10. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2009.10.004. Nurs Outlook. 2010. PMID: 20362779 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Jemal A, et al. Cancer statistics, 2004. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2004;54(1):8–29. - PubMed
-
- American Cancer Society. Breast cancer facts & figures 2001–2002. American Cancer Society; Atlanta: 2003. p. 23.
-
- Olsen O, Gotzsche PC. Cochrane review on screening for breast cancer with mammography. Lancet. 2001;358:1340–42. - PubMed
-
- Feig SA, Hendrick RE. Radiation risk from screening mammography of women aged 40–49 years. Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs. 1997;22:119–124. - PubMed
-
- McCarthy E, et al. Mammography use, breast cancer stage at diagnosis, and suvival among older women. Journal of American Geriatric Society. 2000;48(10):1226–1233. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical