Gait analysis of patients with resurfacing hip arthroplasty compared with hip osteoarthritis and standard total hip arthroplasty
- PMID: 17197316
- DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.03.010
Gait analysis of patients with resurfacing hip arthroplasty compared with hip osteoarthritis and standard total hip arthroplasty
Abstract
Patients with standard total hip arthroplasties may have reduced hip abduction and extension moments when compared with normal nonosteoarthritic hips. In comparison, patients after resurfacing total hip arthroplasty appear to have a near-normal gait. The authors evaluated temporal-spatial parameters, hip kinematics, and kinetics in hip resurfacing patients compared with patients with unilateral osteoarthritic hips and unilateral standard total hip arthroplasties. Patients with resurfacing walked faster (average 1.26 m/s) and were comparable with normals. There were no significant differences in hip abductor and extensor moments of patients with resurfacing compared with patients in the standard hip arthroplasty group. This study showed more normal hip kinematics and functionality in resurfacing hip arthroplasty, which may be due to the large femoral head.
Similar articles
-
Gait symmetry: a comparison of hip resurfacing and jumbo head total hip arthroplasty patients.J Arthroplasty. 2011 Aug;26(5):680-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.07.022. Epub 2010 Sep 29. J Arthroplasty. 2011. PMID: 20884168
-
A comparison of total hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty - patients and outcomes.Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2009;67(2):108-12. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2009. PMID: 19583535
-
The early results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing - a prospective study at a minimum two-year follow-up.Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2009;67(2):132-4. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2009. PMID: 19583540
-
Comparison of functional results of hip resurfacing and total hip replacement: a review of the literature.Orthop Clin North Am. 2011 Apr;42(2):143-51, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2010.12.007. Orthop Clin North Am. 2011. PMID: 21435490 Review.
-
Why total hip resurfacing.J Arthroplasty. 2007 Oct;22(7 Suppl 3):57-60. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.05.050. J Arthroplasty. 2007. PMID: 17919595 Review.
Cited by
-
Hip joint center localisation: A biomechanical application to hip arthroplasty population.World J Orthop. 2012 Aug 18;3(8):131-6. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v3.i8.131. World J Orthop. 2012. PMID: 22919569 Free PMC article.
-
Peri-acetabular bone mineral densityin total hip replacement.Bone Joint Res. 2013 Aug 2;2(8):140-8. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.28.2000173. Print 2013. Bone Joint Res. 2013. PMID: 23913361 Free PMC article.
-
Is there faster recovery with an anterior or anterolateral THA? A pilot study.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Feb;468(2):533-41. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1075-4. Epub 2009 Sep 10. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010. PMID: 19763725 Free PMC article.
-
Application of Metabolomics to Osteoarthritis: from Basic Science to the Clinical Approach.Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2019 May 6;21(6):26. doi: 10.1007/s11926-019-0827-8. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2019. PMID: 31062102 Review.
-
Comparing return to sport activities after short metaphyseal femoral arthroplasty with resurfacing and big femoral head arthroplasties.Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2017 Jul;27(5):617-622. doi: 10.1007/s00590-016-1897-1. Epub 2017 Jan 3. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2017. PMID: 28050701
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical