Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2007 Jan;245(1):36-43.
doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000231758.07868.71.

Partial hepatectomy with wide versus narrow resection margin for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective randomized trial

Ming Shi  1 , Rong-Ping Guo, Xiao-Jun Lin, Ya-Qi Zhang, Min-Shan Chen, Chang-Qing Zhang, Wan Yee Lau, Jin-Qing Li
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Partial hepatectomy with wide versus narrow resection margin for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective randomized trial

Ming Shi et al. Ann Surg. 2007 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of partial hepatectomy aiming grossly at a narrow (1 cm) and a wide (2 cm) resection margin in patients with macroscopically solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Summary background data: For HCC treated with partial hepatectomy, the extent of the margin of liver resection remains controversial despite extensive studies.

Methods: We conducted a prospective randomized trial in patients with solitary HCC. From January 1999 to February 2003, 169 patients with solitary HCC were stratified according to tumor size and randomized to undergo partial hepatectomy aiming grossly at either a narrow (1 cm) (n = 84) or a wide resection margin (2 cm) (n = 85). Analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis.

Results: The demographic and pathologic data were similar in the 2 groups. The mean +/- SD for the final resection margin of the narrow and the wide margin groups were 0.7 +/- 0.4 cm and 1.9 +/- 0.6 cm, respectively. There was no significant difference in the morbidity and in-hospital mortality between the 2 groups of patients. The 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates for the narrow and the wide margin groups were 92.9%, 83.3%, 70.9%, and 49.1% and 96.5%, 91.8%, 86.9%, and 74.9%, respectively. The difference was significant (stratified log-rank test, P = 0.008). Multivariate analysis identified the presence of micrometastases and the treatment allocation were independent risk factors for tumor-related death. At the time of censor, 75 (44.4%) patients had developed tumor recurrence. All recurrences at the margins of liver resection were observed in the narrow margin group. Multiple tumor recurrence was also significantly higher in the narrow margin group (chi test, P = 0.018). Survival after tumor recurrence was significantly better in the wide margin group than the narrow margin group (log-rank test, P = 0.017).

Conclusion: For macroscopically solitary HCC, a resection margin aiming grossly at 2 cm efficaciously and safely decreased postoperative recurrence rate and improved survival outcomes when compared with a gross resection margin aiming at 1 cm, especially for HCC < or =2 cm.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
FIGURE 1. Flow chart of the study.
None
FIGURE 2. Overall survival curves for narrow and wide resection margin groups.
None
FIGURE 3. Recurrence-free survival curves for narrow and wide resection margin groups.
None
FIGURE 4. Overall survival curves after recurrence for narrow and wide resection margin groups.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, et al. Estimating the world cancer burden: Globocan 2000. Int J Cancer. 2001;94:153–156. - PubMed
    1. Nagasue N, Uchida M, Makino Y, et al. Incidence and factors associated with intrahepatic recurrence following resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 1993;105:488–494. - PubMed
    1. Fattovich G, Stroffolini T, Zagni I, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: incidence and risk factors. Gastroenterology. 2004;127(suppl):35–50. - PubMed
    1. Mullin EJ, Metcalfe MS, Maddern GJ. How much liver resection is too much? Am J Surg. 2005;190:87–97. - PubMed
    1. Ko S, Nakajima Y, Kanehiro H, et al. Significant influence of accompanying chronic hepatitis status on recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy: result of multivariate analysis. Ann Surg. 1996;224:591–595. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types