Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2006 Oct 10;86(37):2627-31.

[Effects of functional electrical stimulation on the improvement of motor function of patients with acute stroke: a randomized controlled trial]

[Article in Chinese]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 17198589
Randomized Controlled Trial

[Effects of functional electrical stimulation on the improvement of motor function of patients with acute stroke: a randomized controlled trial]

[Article in Chinese]
Tie-bin Yan et al. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. .

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effects of functional electrical stimulation (FES) on the improvement of motor and walking ability of the lower extremities of the patients with acute stroke.

Methods: Forty-six patients with stroke (including cerebral infarction and hemorrhage), aged 71 +/- 8 (45 - 84), hospitalized within 2 weeks (9 +/- 4 days) after the onset, matched with one another in the baseline measurements before treatment, were assigned randomly into 3 groups: FES group (n = 13), receiving standard rehabilitation combined with FES 30 minutes per day, 5 days per week for 3 weeks, placebo stimulation group (n = 15) receiving standard rehabilitation combined with the installment of the FES apparatus, operated in the same manner as mentioned above, however, without real electric stimulation, and control group (n = 13), receiving standard rehabilitation alone. The score of the composite spasticity scale (CSS) was measured, electromyography was conducted to measure the maximum isometric voluntary contraction (MIVC) of the ankle dorsi-flexors and plantar-flexors, and walking ability by the test of timed "Up and Go" before treatment, weekly during the 3-week treatment, and 8 weeks after the onset of stroke.

Results: After 3 weeks of treatment, the percentage of CSS score of the FES group was 31% +/- 35%, significantly lower than those of the placebo and control groups (50% +/- 88% and 65% +/- 65% respectively, both P < 0.05); the ankle dorsiflexion torque of MIVC of the FES group was 9 Nm +/- 5 Nm, significantly higher than those of the placebo and control groups (5 Nm +/- 3 Nm and 4 Nm +/- 5 Nm respectively, both P < 0.05), and the electromyogram co-contraction ratio of the FES group was 8% +/- 5%, significantly lower than those of the placebo and control groups (27% +/- 26% and 28% +/- 19% respectively, both P < 0.05). The time needed to recover the walking ability after the stroke onset of the FES group was 18 +/- 8 days, shorter by 2 approximately 3 days than those of the placebo and control groups (20 +/- 7 and 21 +/- 8 days respectively). The percentage of the patients able to walk with the help of a stick 3 weeks after treatment of the FES group was 85%, significantly higher than those of the placebo and control groups (60% and 46% respectively, both P < 0.05). 84.6% of the patients of the FES group returned home, a percentage significantly higher than those of the placebo and control groups (53% and 46% respectively, both P < 0.05).

Conclusion: FES, plus standard rehabilitation, is effective in improving the motor and walking ability of the patients with acute stroke, to the degree that most patients are recovered to be able to return home.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types