Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2007 Mar;92(3):865-72.
doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-2184. Epub 2007 Jan 2.

Effect of calorie restriction with or without exercise on body composition and fat distribution

Leanne M Redman  1 , Leonie K Heilbronn, Corby K Martin, Anthony Alfonso, Steven R Smith, Eric Ravussin; Pennington CALERIE Team
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of calorie restriction with or without exercise on body composition and fat distribution

Leanne M Redman et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007 Mar.

Abstract

Context: There is debate over the independent and combined effects of dieting and increased physical activity on improving metabolic risk factors (body composition and fat distribution).

Objective: The objective of the study was to conduct a randomized, controlled trial (CALERIE) to test the effect of a 25% energy deficit by diet alone or diet plus exercise for 6 months on body composition and fat distribution.

Design: This was a randomized, controlled trial.

Setting: The study was conducted at an institutional research center.

Participants: Thirty-five of 36 overweight but otherwise healthy participants (16 males, 19 females) completed the study.

Intervention: Participants were randomized to either control (healthy weight maintenance diet, n = 11), caloric restriction (CR; 25% reduction in energy intake, n = 12), or caloric restriction plus exercise (CR+EX; 12.5% reduction in energy intake + 12.5% increase in exercise energy expenditure, n = 12) for 6 months.

Main outcome measures: Changes in body composition by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and changes in abdominal fat distribution by multislice computed tomography were measured.

Results: The calculated energy deficit across the intervention was not different between CR and CR+EX. Participants lost approximately 10% of body weight (CR: - 8.3 +/- 0.8, CR+EX: - 8.1 +/- 0.8 kg, P = 1.00), approximately 24% of fat mass (CR: - 5.8 +/- 0.6, CR+EX: - 6.4 +/- 0.6 kg, P = 0.99), and 27% of abdominal visceral fat (CR: 0.9 +/- 0.2, CR+EX: 0.8 +/- 0.2 kg, P = 1.00). Both whole-body and abdominal fat distribution were not altered by the intervention.

Conclusion: Exercise plays an equivalent role to CR in terms of energy balance; however, it can also improve aerobic fitness, which has other important cardiovascular and metabolic implications.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00099151.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1
FIG. 1
In healthy overweight men and women, weight, FM, and FFM were reduced after 3 and 6 months of caloric restriction through diet only (CR) or diet in combination with exercise (CR+EX). There was no difference between the two intervention groups. Data represent change (mean ± SEM) from baseline. *, Significant change from baseline; †, CR different from control group; ‡, CR+EX different from control group.
FIG. 2
FIG. 2
The distribution of visceral vs. nonvisceral fat in the whole body (measured by DXA) and the distribution of fat depot within the abdominal compartment (measured by CT) were not changed by 6 months of caloric restriction in over-weight men and women. The data for the CR and CR+EX groups are combined in this analysis (n = 24) and compared with the control group (n = 11). The figure shows the change in VAT and non-VAT fat between baseline and month 6 (M6; A) and the change in abdominal visceral, DSAT, and SSAT between baseline and at month 6 (B). The y-axis shows the contribution of each fat depot in kilograms, and the data within the columns are the percent contribution of the fat depot to the total compartment either whole body (A) or total abdominal (B). AT, Adipose tissue.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Giannopoulou I, Ploutz-Snyder LL, Carhart R, Weinstock RS, Fernhall B, Goulopoulou S, Kanaley JA. Exercise is required for visceral fat loss in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90:1511–1518. - PubMed
    1. Ross R, Dagnone D, Jones PJ, Smith H, Paddags A, Hudson R, Janssen I. Reduction in obesity and related comorbid conditions after diet-induced weight loss or exercise-induced weight loss in men. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133:92–103. - PubMed
    1. Ross R, Janssen I, Dawson J, Kungl AM, Kuk JL, Wong SL, Nguyen-Duy TB, Lee S, Kilpatrick K, Hudson R. Exercise-induced reduction in obesity and insulin resistance in women: a randomized controlled trial. Obes Res. 2004;12:789–798. - PubMed
    1. Sopko G, Leon AS, Jacobs DR, Jr, Foster N, Moy J, Kuba K, Anderson JT, Casal D, McNally C, Frantz I. The effects of exercise and weight loss on plasma lipids in young obese men. Metabolism. 1985;34:227–236. - PubMed
    1. Cox KL, Burke V, Morton AR, Beilin LJ, Puddey IB. The independent and combined effects of 16 weeks of vigorous exercise and energy restriction on body mass and composition in free-living overweight men—a randomized controlled trial. Metabolism. 2003;52:107–115. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data