Nonoperative treatment compared with plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. A multicenter, randomized clinical trial
- PMID: 17200303
- DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00020
Nonoperative treatment compared with plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. A multicenter, randomized clinical trial
Abstract
Background: Recent studies have shown a high prevalence of symptomatic malunion and nonunion after nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. We sought to compare patient-oriented outcome and complication rates following nonoperative treatment and those after plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures.
Methods: In a multicenter, prospective clinical trial, 132 patients with a displaced midshaft fracture of the clavicle were randomized (by sealed envelope) to either operative treatment with plate fixation (sixty-seven patients) or nonoperative treatment with a sling (sixty-five patients). Outcome analysis included standard clinical follow-up and the Constant shoulder score, the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, and plain radiographs. One hundred and eleven patients (sixty-two managed operatively and forty-nine managed nonoperatively) completed one year of follow-up. There were no differences between the two groups with respect to patient demographics, mechanism of injury, associated injuries, Injury Severity Score, or fracture pattern.
Results: Constant shoulder scores and DASH scores were significantly improved in the operative fixation group at all time-points (p = 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively). The mean time to radiographic union was 28.4 weeks in the non-operative group compared with 16.4 weeks in the operative group (p = 0.001). There were two nonunions in the operative group compared with seven in the nonoperative group (p = 0.042). Symptomatic malunion developed in nine patients in the nonoperative group and in none in the operative group (p = 0.001). Most complications in the operative group were hardware-related (five patients had local irritation and/or prominence of the hardware, three had a wound infection, and one had mechanical failure). At one year after the injury, the patients in the operative group were more likely to be satisfied with the appearance of the shoulder (p = 0.001) and with the shoulder in general (p = 0.002) than were those in the nonoperative group.
Conclusions: Operative fixation of a displaced fracture of the clavicular shaft results in improved functional outcome and a lower rate of malunion and nonunion compared with nonoperative treatment at one year of follow-up. Hardware removal remains the most common reason for repeat intervention in the operative group. This study supports primary plate fixation of completely displaced midshaft clavicular fractures in active adult patients.
Comment in
-
Nonoperative treatment compared with plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Aug;89(8):1866; author reply 1866-7. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200708000-00029. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007. PMID: 17671028 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Nonoperative treatment compared with plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. Surgical technique.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Mar;90 Suppl 2 Pt 1:1-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01336. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008. PMID: 18310682 Clinical Trial.
-
Open reduction and plate fixation versus nonoperative treatment for displaced midshaft clavicular fractures: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Sep 4;95(17):1576-84. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00307. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013. PMID: 24005198 Clinical Trial.
-
Plate Fixation Compared with Nonoperative Treatment for Displaced Midshaft Clavicular Fractures: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Jan 18;99(2):106-112. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01394. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017. PMID: 28099300 Clinical Trial.
-
Plate Fixation Versus Nonoperative Treatment for Displaced Midshaft Clavicular Fractures: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Jun 21;99(12):1051-1057. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01068. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017. PMID: 28632595 Review.
-
Midshaft Fractures of the Clavicle: A Meta-analysis Comparing Surgical Fixation Using Anteroinferior Plating Versus Superior Plating.J Orthop Trauma. 2017 Sep;31(9):461-467. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000936. J Orthop Trauma. 2017. PMID: 28708779 Review.
Cited by
-
Complications of operative treatment of clavicle fractures in a Level I Trauma Center.Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014 Aug;24(6):839-44. doi: 10.1007/s00590-013-1273-3. Epub 2013 Jul 17. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014. PMID: 23860808
-
Outcomes and complications after dual plate vs. single plate fixation of displaced mid-shaft clavicle fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021 Apr 14;17:261-266. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.03.024. eCollection 2021 Jun. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021. PMID: 33936947 Free PMC article.
-
CORR Insights®: Patient Position Is Related to the Risk of Neurovascular Injury in Clavicular Plating: A Cadaveric Study.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Dec;477(12):2769-2771. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000929. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019. PMID: 31764349 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Kirschner Wire Temporary Intramedullary Fixation Combined with a Locking Anatomical Plate versus a Reconstruction Plate in the Treatment of Comminuted Clavicular Fractures: A Retrospective Study.Biomed Res Int. 2018 Dec 23;2018:5017162. doi: 10.1155/2018/5017162. eCollection 2018. Biomed Res Int. 2018. PMID: 30671456 Free PMC article.
-
Minimally-Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis for Clavicle Fractures.Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2021 Oct 1;57(2):295-300. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1731358. eCollection 2022 Apr. Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2021. PMID: 35652028 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical