Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2007 Jan;18(1):155-63.
doi: 10.1007/s10856-006-0675-8.

Evaluation of surface characteristics of dental composites using profilometry, scanning electron, atomic force microscopy and gloss-meter

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Evaluation of surface characteristics of dental composites using profilometry, scanning electron, atomic force microscopy and gloss-meter

A Kakaboura et al. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2007 Jan.

Abstract

The aim of this in vitro investigation was to compare various roughness and topography measurement methods to characterize the surface quality in several types of resin composites. The initial surface quality of several resin composites was compared. The materials evaluated were of three categories: i) hybrid: TPH Spectrum; ii) reinforced microfill: Micronew and iii) microhybrid: Synergy Duo, Esthet-X, Point.4 and Palfique Estelite. Three Groups of identical disk-shaped specimens (10 x 1.5 mm) were prepared from each material (n = 6) and polished with Soflex discs. Macro-roughness (Ra) was measured with Group 1 by 2-D profilometry. Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) gave 3-D images and micro-roughness (Ra) of Group 2. Surface optical gloss at 60 degrees was determined for Group 3. Specimens of each material were also studied by scanning electron microscopy. Macro-Ra values (microm) ranged from 0.30 to 0.56. Micro-Ra values ranged from 0.03 to 0.14 and they differed from macro-Ra values in ranking order. Percentage Gloss values ranged from 30.6 to 70.1%. The results revealed that micro-roughness showed a high correlation with gloss values (r = 0.93), whilst macro-roughness did not (r = 0.62). Moreover, the AFM method showed higher capability to distinguish surface roughness compared with the 2-D profilometry and to reveal more detailed definition of surface texture than the examination under SEM.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Oper Dent. 2001 Nov-Dec;26(6):562-8 - PubMed
    1. Oper Dent. 2002 May-Jun;27(3):243-7 - PubMed
    1. Am J Dent. 2000 Nov;13(Spec No):3D-18D - PubMed
    1. J Oral Rehabil. 1995 Jun;22(6):421-7 - PubMed
    1. J Dent. 2000 Jul;28(5):367-73 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources