Grounding the figure: surface attachment influences figure-ground organization
- PMID: 17201352
- DOI: 10.3758/bf03193963
Grounding the figure: surface attachment influences figure-ground organization
Abstract
We investigated whether the lower region effect on figure-ground organization (Vecera, Vogel, and Woodman, 2002) would generalize to contextual depth planes in vertical orientations, as is predicted by a theoretical analysis based on the ecological statistics of edges arising from objects that are attached to surfaces of support. Observers viewed left/right ambiguous figure-ground displays that occluded middle sections of four types of contextual inducers: two types of attached, receding, vertical planes (walls) that used linear perspective and/or texture gradients to induce perceived depth and two types of similar trapezoidal control figures that used either uniform color or random texture to reduce or eliminate perceived depth. The results showed a reliable bias toward seeing as "figure" the side of the figure-ground display that was attached to the receding depth plane, but no such bias for the corresponding side in either of the control conditions. The results are interpreted as being consistent with the attachment hypothesis that the lower region cue to figure-ground organization results from ecological biases in edge interpretation that arise when objects are attached to supporting surfaces in the terrestrial gravitational field.
Similar articles
-
The time course of figure-ground reversal.Percept Psychophys. 2005 May;67(4):595-605. doi: 10.3758/bf03193517. Percept Psychophys. 2005. PMID: 16134454
-
Extremal edges versus other principles of figure-ground organization.J Vis. 2010 Jul 1;10(8):3. doi: 10.1167/10.8.3. J Vis. 2010. PMID: 20884578
-
Extremal edges: a powerful cue to depth perception and figure-ground organization.Psychol Sci. 2008 Jan;19(1):77-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02049.x. Psychol Sci. 2008. PMID: 18181795
-
3-D vision and figure-ground separation by visual cortex.Percept Psychophys. 1994 Jan;55(1):48-121. doi: 10.3758/bf03206880. Percept Psychophys. 1994. PMID: 8036093 Review.
-
Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: anatomy, physiology, and perception.Science. 1988 May 6;240(4853):740-9. doi: 10.1126/science.3283936. Science. 1988. PMID: 3283936 Review.
Cited by
-
Figure-ground discrimination in the avian brain: the nucleus rotundus and its inhibitory complex.Vision Res. 2012 Oct 1;70:18-26. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.07.023. Epub 2012 Aug 15. Vision Res. 2012. PMID: 22917681 Free PMC article.
-
Lack of color integration in visual short-term memory binding.Mem Cognit. 2011 Oct;39(7):1187-97. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0107-y. Mem Cognit. 2011. PMID: 21557004
-
The importance of being relevant.Front Psychol. 2012 Aug 30;3:309. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00309. eCollection 2012. Front Psychol. 2012. PMID: 22969739 Free PMC article.
-
Visual performance fields: frames of reference.PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24470. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024470. Epub 2011 Sep 8. PLoS One. 2011. PMID: 21931727 Free PMC article.
-
A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure-ground organization.Psychol Bull. 2012 Nov;138(6):1172-217. doi: 10.1037/a0029333. Epub 2012 Jul 30. Psychol Bull. 2012. PMID: 22845751 Free PMC article. Review.