Visual memory for shapes in deaf signers and nonsigners and in hearing signers and nonsigners: atypical lateralization and enhancement
- PMID: 17201534
- DOI: 10.1037/0894-4105.21.1.114
Visual memory for shapes in deaf signers and nonsigners and in hearing signers and nonsigners: atypical lateralization and enhancement
Erratum in
- Neuropsychology. 2007 May;21(3):399
Abstract
Deaf and hearing individuals who either used sign language (signers) or not (nonsigners) were tested on visual memory for objects and shapes that were difficult to describe verbally with a same/different matching paradigm. The use of 4 groups was designed to permit a separation of effects related to sign language use (signers vs. nonsigners) and effects related to auditory deprivation (deaf vs. hearing). Forty deaf native signers and nonsigners and 51 hearing signers and nonsigners participated in the study. Signing individuals (both deaf and hearing) were more accurate than nonsigning individuals (deaf and hearing) at memorizing shapes. For the shape memory task but not the object task, deaf signers and nonsigners displayed right hemisphere (RH) advantage over the left hemisphere (LH). Conversely, both hearing groups displayed a memory advantage for shapes in the LH over the RH. Results indicate that enhanced memory performance for shapes in signers (deaf and hearing) stems from the visual skills acquired through sign language use and that deafness, irrespective of language background, leads to the use of a visually based strategy for memory of difficult-to-describe items.
(c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Visual field asymmetries for motion processing in deaf and hearing signers.Brain Cogn. 2002 Jun;49(1):170-81. doi: 10.1006/brcg.2001.1498. Brain Cogn. 2002. PMID: 12027401
-
Atypical lateralization of memory for location: effects of deafness and sign language use.Brain Cogn. 2005 Jul;58(2):226-39. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.12.001. Epub 2005 Jan 28. Brain Cogn. 2005. PMID: 15919555
-
Neural Activity During Mental Rotation in Deaf Signers: The Influence of Long-Term Sign Language Experience.Ear Hear. 2018 Sep/Oct;39(5):1015-1024. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000540. Ear Hear. 2018. PMID: 29298164
-
Signed language working memory capacity of signed language interpreters and deaf signers.J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2013 Apr;18(2):271-86. doi: 10.1093/deafed/ens068. Epub 2013 Jan 9. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2013. PMID: 23303377 Review.
-
Sign language and Chinese characters on visual-spatial memory: a literature review.Percept Mot Skills. 2003 Dec;97(3 Pt 1):797-802. doi: 10.2466/pms.2003.97.3.797. Percept Mot Skills. 2003. PMID: 14738343 Review.
Cited by
-
Numerical and Real-World Estimation Abilities of Deaf and Hearing College Students.Deafness Educ Int. 2018;20(2):59-79. doi: 10.1080/14643154.2018.1437238. Epub 2018 Mar 6. Deafness Educ Int. 2018. PMID: 30745858 Free PMC article.
-
Computerized cognitive training for improving cochlear-implanted children's working memory and language skills.Iran J Child Neurol. 2022 Fall;16(4):9-22. doi: 10.22037/ijcn.v16i4.30499. Epub 2022 Oct 23. Iran J Child Neurol. 2022. PMID: 36478997 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Auditory deprivation affects biases of visuospatial attention as measured by line bisection.Exp Brain Res. 2014 Sep;232(9):2767-73. doi: 10.1007/s00221-014-3960-7. Epub 2014 Apr 26. Exp Brain Res. 2014. PMID: 24770861
-
Don't Assume Deaf Students are Visual Learners.J Dev Phys Disabil. 2017 Feb;29(1):153-171. doi: 10.1007/s10882-016-9494-0. Epub 2016 Jun 2. J Dev Phys Disabil. 2017. PMID: 28344430 Free PMC article.
-
Manual Movement in Sign Languages: One Hand Versus Two in Communicating Shapes.Cogn Sci. 2019 Sep;43(9):e12741. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12741. Cogn Sci. 2019. PMID: 31529533 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical