The mirror effect and mixture signal detection theory
- PMID: 17201552
- DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.1.18
The mirror effect and mixture signal detection theory
Abstract
The mirror effect for word frequency refers to the finding that low-frequency words have higher hit rates and lower false alarm rates than high-frequency words. This result is typically interpreted in terms of conventional signal detection theory (SDT), in which case it indicates that the order of the underlying old item distributions mirrors the order of the new item distributions. However, when viewed in terms of a mixture version of SDT, the order of hits and false alarms does not necessarily imply the same order in the underlying distributions because of possible effects of mixing. A reversal in underlying distributions did not appear for fits of mixture SDT models to data from 4 experiments.
(c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Signal detection theory analyses of semantic priming in word recognition.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2003 Dec;29(6):1251-66. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.6.1251. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2003. PMID: 14640842
-
Feature sampling in detection: implications for the measurement of perceptual independence.J Exp Psychol Gen. 2007 Feb;136(1):133-53. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.1.133. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2007. PMID: 17324088
-
Investigating strength and frequency effects in recognition memory using type-2 signal detection theory.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Jan;35(1):57-80. doi: 10.1037/a0013865. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009. PMID: 19210081
-
An integrated theory of attention and decision making in visual signal detection.Psychol Rev. 2009 Apr;116(2):283-317. doi: 10.1037/a0015156. Psychol Rev. 2009. PMID: 19348543 Review.
-
Statistical decision theory to relate neurons to behavior in the study of covert visual attention.Vision Res. 2009 Jun;49(10):1097-128. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.12.008. Epub 2009 Jan 10. Vision Res. 2009. PMID: 19138699 Review.
Cited by
-
Some-or-none recollection: Evidence from item and source memory.J Exp Psychol Gen. 2010 May;139(2):341-64. doi: 10.1037/a0018926. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2010. PMID: 20438255 Free PMC article.
-
ROC residuals in signal-detection models of recognition memory.Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Feb;23(1):253-64. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0888-2. Psychon Bull Rev. 2016. PMID: 26228182
-
Examining the causes of memory strength variability: recollection, attention failure, or encoding variability?J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Nov;39(6):1726-41. doi: 10.1037/a0033671. Epub 2013 Jul 8. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013. PMID: 23834057 Free PMC article.
-
Assumptions behind scoring source versus item memory: Effects of age, hippocampal lesions and mild memory problems.Cortex. 2017 Jun;91:297-315. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.01.001. Epub 2017 Jan 12. Cortex. 2017. PMID: 28162777 Free PMC article.
-
Recognition memory models and binary-response ROCs: a comparison by minimum description length.Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Aug;20(4):693-719. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0407-2. Psychon Bull Rev. 2013. PMID: 23504915
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources