Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Jun;83(3):175-9; discussion 179-80.
doi: 10.1136/sti.2006.021816.

BD ProbeTec ET assay for the diagnosis of gonorrhoea in a high-risk population: a protocol for replacing traditional microscopy and culture techniques

Affiliations

BD ProbeTec ET assay for the diagnosis of gonorrhoea in a high-risk population: a protocol for replacing traditional microscopy and culture techniques

Claire Ryan et al. Sex Transm Infect. 2007 Jun.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the Neisseria gonorrhoeae Becton Dickinson (BD) ProbeTec strand displacement assay (SDA) on female endocervical swab and male first void urine against culture for Neisseria gonorrhoeae on female endocervical and urethral swab for the diagnosis of N gonorrhoeae infection in genitourinary medicine (GUM) attendees. To determine an algorithm for implementation of N gonorrhoeae infection screening by SDA in these patients taking account of the desirability of having a N gonorrhoeae isolate in people with N gonorrhoeae infection.

Methods: Initially, 1582 patients attending the GUM clinic were tested for N gonorrhoeae infection by SDA and routine microscopy, and culture. On the basis of the results, a protocol for diagnosis of N gonorrhoeae infection by SDA, with culture specimens only from patients with a listed risk factor for acquiring N gonorrhoeae infection, was devised and implemented. A post implementation audit was done to assess the effectiveness of this protocol for routine service use.

Results: There was good concurrence between the N gonorrhoeae SDA and culture results with a N gonorrhoeae infection prevalence rate of 3.4% by both methods. All men and 85% of women with N gonorrhoeae infection had an identifiable risk factor for acquiring infection. Overall, 38% men and 60% women attending the GUM clinic had this listed risk factor for acquiring N gonorrhoeae. Post implementation audit confirmed the initial findings.

Conclusion: Nucleic acid amplification techniques like the SDA are sensitive and specific for diagnosis of N gonorrhoeae. We were able to list certain risk factors, which were predictive of those patients most likely to have N gonorrhoeae infection. To obtain timely sensitivity data, a culture specimen should also be submitted at the same time from patients deemed to have a listed risk factor for acquiring Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Health Protection Agency HIV and other sexually transmitted infections in the UK 2005. http://www.hpa.org.uk/publications/hiv_sti_2005/default.htm
    1. Van Dyck E, Leven M, Pattyn S.et al Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by enzyme immunoassay, culture, and three nucleic acid amplification tests. J Clin Microbiol 2001391751–1756. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boyadzhyan B, Yashina T, Yatabe J H.et al Comparison of the APTIMA CT and GC assays with the APTIMA combo 2 assay, the Abbott LCx assay, and direct fluorescent‐antibody and culture assays for the selection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J Clin Microbiol 2004423089–3093. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Health Protection Agency The gonococcal resistance to antibiotics surveillance programme. Annual report 2004. London: Health Protection Agency, 2004
    1. De Silva T, Kudesia G, Joall A.et al Significance of low positive scores obtained with a method other than acceleration in the BD ProbeTec‐Strand displacement amplification test for detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J Clin Microbiol 2006444628–4629. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types