Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2007 Jul;91(7):945-8.
doi: 10.1136/bjo.2006.106799. Epub 2007 Jan 3.

25-gauge vs 20-gauge system for pars plana vitrectomy: a prospective randomised clinical trial

Lukas Kellner  1 , Barbara Wimpissinger, Ulrike Stolba, Werner Brannath, Susanne Binder
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

25-gauge vs 20-gauge system for pars plana vitrectomy: a prospective randomised clinical trial

Lukas Kellner et al. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007 Jul.

Abstract

Aim: To compare 25-gauge vs 20-gauge system for pars plana vitrectomy in a prospective, randomised, controlled clinical trial.

Methods: Three-port pars plana vitrectomy was performed in 60 patients belonging to 2 groups. Evaluations were performed preoperatively, intraoperatively, during the first three postoperative days, at 1 week, and at 1 and 3 months. The main outcome measure was time for surgery, divided into duration of wound opening, vitrectomy, retinal manipulation and wound closure.

Results: The total duration of surgery showed no significant difference between the groups (p = 0.67). The 25-gauge group showed significantly shorter duration of wound opening (p<0.001) and wound closure (p<0.001). In contrast, the vitrectomy duration was significantly longer in the 25-gauge group (p<0.001). Conjunctival injection and subjective postoperative pain showed significantly lower irritation in the 25-gauge group (p<0.001 for both).

Conclusion: The 25-gauge vitrectomy system offered significantly improved patient comfort during the first postoperative week. The smaller surgical openings facilitated wound healing and minimised pain. Duration of surgery was comparable between the two systems-the shorter time needed for wound opening and closure in the 25-gauge group being equalised by the longer vitrectomy duration. Intraoperative as well as retinal manipulation and illumination caused more surgical difficulties using the 25-gauge system.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

References

    1. O'Malley C, Heintz R M., Sr Vitrectomy with an alternative instrument system. Ann Ophthalmol. 1975;7: 585–8, 591–4, - PubMed
    1. Peyman G A. A miniaturized vitrectomy system for vitreous and retinal biopsy. Can J Ophthalmol 199025285–286. - PubMed
    1. Fujii G Y, De Juan E, Jr, Humayun M S.et al Initial experience using the transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy system for vitreoretinal surgery. Ophthalmology 20021091814–1820. - PubMed
    1. Fujii G Y, De Juan E, Jr, Humayun M S.et al A new 25‐gauge instrument system for transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy surgery. Ophthalmology 20021091807–1812. - PubMed
    1. Ibarra M S, Hermel M, Prenner J L.et al Longer‐term outcomes of transconjunctival sutureless 25‐gauge vitrectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 2005139831–836. - PubMed

Publication types