Surgical or nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis? A randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 17202885
- DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000251014.81875.6d
Surgical or nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis? A randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Study design: A randomized controlled trial.
Objectives: To assess the effectiveness of decompressive surgery as compared with nonoperative measures in the treatment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
Summary of background data: No previous randomized trial has assessed the effectiveness of surgery in comparison with conservative treatment for spinal stenosis.
Methods: Four university hospitals agreed on the classification of the disease, inclusion and exclusion criteria, radiographic routines, surgical principles, nonoperative treatment options, and follow-up protocols. A total of 94 patients were randomized into a surgical or nonoperative treatment group: 50 and 44 patients, respectively. Surgery comprised undercutting laminectomy of the stenotic segments in 10 patients augmented with transpedicular fusion. The primary outcome was based on assessment of functional disability using the Oswestry Disability Index (scale, 0-100). Data on the intensity of leg and back pain (scales, 0-10), as well as self-reported and measured walking ability were compiled at randomization and at follow-up examinations at 6, 12, and 24 months.
Results: Both treatment groups showed improvement during follow-up. At 1 year, the mean difference in favor of surgery was 11.3 in disability (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.3-18.4), 1.7 in leg pain (95% CI, 0.4-3.0), and 2.3(95% CI, 1.1-3.6) in back pain. At the 2-year follow-up, the mean differences were slightly less: 7.8 in disability (95% CI, 0.8-14.9) 1.5 in leg pain (95% CI, 0.3-2.8), and 2.1 in back pain (95% CI, 1.0-3.3). Walking ability, either reported or measured, did not differ between the two treatment groups.
Conclusions: Although patients improved over the 2-year follow-up regardless of initial treatment, those undergoing decompressive surgery reported greater improvement regarding leg pain, back pain, and overall disability. The relative benefit of initial surgical treatment diminished over time, but outcomes of surgery remained favorable at 2 years. Longer follow-up is needed to determine if these differences persist.
Comment in
-
Surgery reduced pain and disability in lumbar spinal stenosis better than nonoperative treatment.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Aug;89(8):1872. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.8908.ebo2. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007. PMID: 17671033 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Depressive burden in the preoperative and early recovery phase predicts poorer surgery outcome among lumbar spinal stenosis patients: a one-year prospective follow-up study.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Nov 1;34(23):2573-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b317bd. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009. PMID: 19927107
-
The effect of surgical and nonsurgical treatment on longitudinal outcomes of lumbar spinal stenosis over 10 years.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 May;53(5):785-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53254.x. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005. PMID: 15877553
-
Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.Spine J. 2008 Mar-Apr;8(2):380-4. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.01.010. Epub 2007 Mar 13. Spine J. 2008. PMID: 17433781
-
Surgical results of lumbar spinal stenosis.Ann Chir Gynaecol Suppl. 1995;210:1-969. Ann Chir Gynaecol Suppl. 1995. PMID: 8546434 Review.
-
[Controversies about instrumented surgery and pain relief in degenerative lumbar spine pain. Results of scientific evidence].Neurocirugia (Astur). 2007 Oct;18(5):406-13. Neurocirugia (Astur). 2007. PMID: 18008014 Review. Spanish.
Cited by
-
Endoscopic Versus Open Laminectomy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: An International, Multi-Institutional Analysis of Outcomes and Adverse Events.Global Spine J. 2020 Sep;10(6):720-728. doi: 10.1177/2192568219872157. Epub 2019 Aug 21. Global Spine J. 2020. PMID: 32707015 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing the Impact of Neurogenic Claudication on Outcomes Following Decompression With Lumbar Interbody Fusions in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.Global Spine J. 2021 Mar;11(2):203-211. doi: 10.1177/2192568220902746. Epub 2020 Feb 6. Global Spine J. 2021. PMID: 32875876 Free PMC article.
-
Reoperations Following Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis.Indian J Orthop. 2018 Nov-Dec;52(6):578-583. doi: 10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_380_17. Indian J Orthop. 2018. PMID: 30532296 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Exercise therapy versus surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Pak J Med Sci. 2018 Jul-Aug;34(4):879-885. doi: 10.12669/pjms.344.14349. Pak J Med Sci. 2018. PMID: 30190746 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Concerns and Experiences of Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Regarding Prehabilitation and Recovery After Spine Surgery: A Qualitative Study.Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2022 Aug 23;4(4):100227. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2022.100227. eCollection 2022 Dec. Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2022. PMID: 36545515 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials