Operating room versus office-based injection laryngoplasty: a comparative analysis of reimbursement
- PMID: 17204989
- DOI: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000250898.82268.39
Operating room versus office-based injection laryngoplasty: a comparative analysis of reimbursement
Abstract
Background: Injection laryngoplasty (IL) continues to evolve as new indications, techniques, approaches, and injection materials are developed. Although historically performed under local or general anesthesia in the operating room suite, IL is now increasingly being performed in an office-based setting. This report presents the results of a reimbursement analysis comparing office-based versus operative IL.
Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the reimbursement of office-based injection laryngoplasty with the reimbursement of performing the same procedure in the operating room.
Design: The authors conducted reimbursement and outcome analysis through retrospective office chart and hospital record review.
Methods: A retrospective review was performed of the hospital records of patients having undergone injection laryngoplasty at the University of Pittsburgh Voice Center from July 1998 through March 2005. Group I included patients who underwent IL in the operating room, whereas group II included those who had office-based IL. A reimbursement analysis for both groups was then performed comparing surgeon fees, anesthesia, and hospital charges and reimbursement. The clinical efficacy of IL performed in either office versus operating room settings was measured by comparing the pre- and postintervention Voice Handicap Index-10 scores for all patients. A predictive model of potential cost savings is developed based on the results of the analysis.
Results: Average reimbursement was 2,505 dollars for group I (n = 108) and 496 dollars for group II (n = 50). This reimbursement differential was preserved across the various insurance types examined. There was no significant difference in Voice Handicap Index-10 change after surgery between group I and II.
Conclusions: Office-based IL is both clinically and financially effective, providing patients with a convenient and flexible alternative to operating room-based intervention for glottal insufficiency.
Similar articles
-
A cost and time analysis of laryngology procedures in the endoscopy suite versus the operating room.Laryngoscope. 2016 Jun;126(6):1385-9. doi: 10.1002/lary.25653. Epub 2015 Sep 30. Laryngoscope. 2016. PMID: 26422328
-
Office-based laser surgery of the larynx: cost-effective treatment at the office's expense.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 May;146(5):769-73. doi: 10.1177/0194599811434896. Epub 2012 Jan 18. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012. PMID: 22261492
-
Comparison of long-term voice outcomes after vocal fold augmentation using autologous fat injection by direct microlaryngoscopy versus office-based calcium hydroxylapatite injection.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Aug;274(8):3147-3151. doi: 10.1007/s00405-017-4600-1. Epub 2017 May 6. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017. PMID: 28478500
-
Systematic Review of Voice Outcomes for Injection Laryngoplasty Performed under Local vs General Anesthesia.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Oct;159(4):608-614. doi: 10.1177/0194599818780207. Epub 2018 Jul 10. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018. PMID: 29989849
-
The thyrohyoid approach to in-office injection augmentation of the vocal fold.Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Dec;15(6):412-6. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e3282f033ec. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007. PMID: 17986881 Review.
Cited by
-
Long-term Surveillance Following Intralesional Steroid Injection for Benign Vocal Fold Lesions.JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Jun 1;143(6):589-594. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2016.4418. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017. PMID: 28334309 Free PMC article.
-
Office-Based Laryngeal Biopsy in Patients Ineligible for General Anesthesia.Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Nov;32(113):373-378. doi: 10.22038/ijorl.2020.42544.2436. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2020. PMID: 33282785 Free PMC article.
-
[Glottis injection to improve voice function : Review of more than 500 operations].HNO. 2015 Jul;63(7):489-96. doi: 10.1007/s00106-015-0029-2. HNO. 2015. PMID: 26104911 Review. German.
-
National Trends in Treatment of Acute Unilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis at Tertiary Care Voice Centers.Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2025 Apr 2;10(2):e70135. doi: 10.1002/lio2.70135. eCollection 2025 Apr. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2025. PMID: 40177257 Free PMC article.
-
Feasibility and Associated Limitations of Office-Based Laryngeal Surgery Using Carbon Dioxide Lasers.JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 May 1;143(5):485-491. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2016.4129. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017. PMID: 28208177 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources