Undergraduate education about cancer

Abstract

The quality, quantity and balance of undergraduate cancer teaching in Australian Medical Schools were investigated by a survey, using a self-administered questionnaire, of recent graduates from all Australian medical schools. Stratified random cluster sampling was used and a response rate of 84% (389 respondents) was achieved. The results revealed substantial differences in knowledge, experience in, and rating of teaching between the medical, surgical, radiotherapeutic and palliative components of cancer management. The proportions of graduates who had never attended radiotherapy and palliative care clinics or units (42.3% and 49.9%, respectively) were more than double the proportion who had never attended medical and surgical cancer clinics or units (17.5% and 10.9%, respectively). More than twice as many graduates rated their instruction in the palliative management of cancer as poor or very poor (29.4%) compared with those rating their instruction as poor or very poor in both cancer prevention (8.4%) and treatment for cure (14.6%). The respondents displayed a considerable lack of knowledge about radiotherapy treatment options, and reported a lack of perceived competence in doing cervical smears. Their answers to questions about 5-year survival of selected cancers, about the existence of screening tests validly shown to reduce mortality, and the ages at which breast and cervical cancers are likely to develop all revealed worrying levels of incorrect knowledge. There was some important disturbing variation in levels of knowledge, experience and rating of cancer instruction between states and between universities.