Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Feb;99(3):301-11.
doi: 10.1007/s00421-006-0339-x. Epub 2007 Jan 6.

Correction of compliance and resistance altered by endotracheal tube leaks and non-linear pressure/volume-relationships

Affiliations

Correction of compliance and resistance altered by endotracheal tube leaks and non-linear pressure/volume-relationships

Werner Nikischin et al. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007 Feb.

Abstract

Measurements of lung compliance (C) and resistance (R) are influenced by endotracheal tube leaks (ETTL) as well as non-linear pressure/volume relationships (P/V relationship). To keep C and R reliable, we developed an algorithm to mathematically correct inspiratory and expiratory volume (V) and flow. In this study, a ventilated lung model for non-linear P/V relationship with adjustment of an increasing ETTL was studied. In addition, the recordings (airway pressure, flow, and volume) of 21 infants (median weight: 1,220 g, range: 640-2,160 g, with a median leak size of 32%, range: 24-56%) were investigated. C and R were calculated continuously from the recordings of flow, volume, and airway pressure over time according to the changing volume. A method especially developed for the analysis of non-linear pressure-volume-relationship (APVNL) was employed. C and R affected by leaks were corrected applying the newly developed mathematical algorithm and compared with measurements without leakage. C could be corrected up to a leak of 80% and R up to 55% leak at half tidal V for the model with non-linear P/V-R. C and R without leak and after leak correction did not differ significantly in all infants where the APVNL method was applied (P > 0.05).

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Oct;158(4):1052-60 - PubMed
    1. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1988;4(3):150-8 - PubMed
    1. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2003 Jul;4(3):344-52 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Invest. 1959 Dec;38:2168-75 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources