Microvolt T-wave alternans identifies patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy who benefit from implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy
- PMID: 17207722
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.06.079
Microvolt T-wave alternans identifies patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy who benefit from implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy
Abstract
Objectives: This study sought to assess whether implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) have different mortality benefits among patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy who screen negative and non-negative (positive and indeterminate) for microvolt T-wave alternans (MTWA).
Background: Microvolt T-wave alternans has been proposed as an effective tool for risk stratification. However, no studies have examined whether ICD benefits differ by MTWA group.
Methods: We developed a prospective cohort of 768 patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (left ventricular ejection fraction < or =35%) and no prior sustained ventricular arrhythmia, of which 392 (51%) received ICDs. The mean follow-up time was 27 +/- 12 months. Propensity scores for ICD implantation based on the variables most likely to influence defibrillator implantation were developed for each MTWA cohort. Multivariable Cox analyses that controlled for propensity score, demographics, and clinical variables evaluated the degree to which ICDs decreased mortality risk for each MTWA group.
Results: We identified 514 (67%) patients with a non-negative MTWA test result. After multivariable adjustment, ICDs were associated with lower all-cause mortality in MTWA-non-negative patients (hazard ratio [HR] 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27 to 0.76, p = 0.003) but not in MTWA-negative patients (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.33 to 2.20, p = 0.73) (for interaction, p = 0.04), with the mortality benefit in MTWA-non-negative patients largely mediated through arrhythmic mortality reduction (HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.68, p = 0.004). The number needed to treat with an ICD for 2 years to save 1 life was 9 among MTWA-non-negative patients and 76 among MTWA-negative patients.
Conclusions: In patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and no prior history of ventricular arrhythmia, mortality reduction with ICD implantation differs by MTWA status, with implications for risk stratification and health policy.
Comment in
-
Should microvolt T-wave alternans be utilized routinely in selecting patients for prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator insertion in the setting of ischemic heart disease?J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Jan 2;49(1):59-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.10.008. Epub 2006 Dec 13. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007. PMID: 17207723 No abstract available.
-
Microvolt T-wave alternans: an effective approach to risk stratification in ischemic cardiomyopathy?Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2007 Jun;4(6):300-1. doi: 10.1038/ncpcardio0886. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2007. PMID: 17471275 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Prognostic utility of microvolt T-wave alternans in risk stratification of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 May 2;47(9):1820-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.11.079. Epub 2006 Apr 19. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006. PMID: 16682307
-
Does microvolt T-wave alternans testing predict ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and prophylactic defibrillators? The MASTER (Microvolt T Wave Alternans Testing for Risk Stratification of Post-Myocardial Infarction Patients) trial.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Nov 11;52(20):1607-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.08.018. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008. PMID: 18992649
-
Usefulness of microvolt T-wave alternans on predicting outcome in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy with and without defibrillators.Am J Cardiol. 2007 Aug 15;100(4):598-604. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.03.069. Epub 2007 Jun 28. Am J Cardiol. 2007. PMID: 17697813
-
Enhancing specificity without sacrificing sensitivity: potential benefits of using microvolt T-wave alternans testing to risk stratify the MADIT-II population.Card Electrophysiol Rev. 2003 Dec;7(4):438-42. doi: 10.1023/B:CEPR.0000023161.35685.68. Card Electrophysiol Rev. 2003. PMID: 15071271 Review.
-
Can microvolt T-wave alternans testing reduce unnecessary defibrillator implantation?Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2005 Oct;2(10):522-8. doi: 10.1038/ncpcardio0323. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2005. PMID: 16186850 Review.
Cited by
-
Risk stratification for sudden cardiac death: current approaches and predictive value.Curr Cardiol Rev. 2009 Jan;5(1):56-64. doi: 10.2174/157340309787048130. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2009. PMID: 20066150 Free PMC article.
-
Who should receive an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator after myocardial infarction?Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2009 Dec;6(4):236-44. doi: 10.1007/s11897-009-0033-5. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2009. PMID: 19948092 Review.
-
Prospective observational study of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in primary prevention of sudden cardiac death: study design and cohort description.J Am Heart Assoc. 2013 Feb 22;2(1):e000083. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.112.000083. J Am Heart Assoc. 2013. PMID: 23525420 Free PMC article.
-
Microvolt T-wave Alternans: Where Are We Now?Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2016 May;5(1):37-40. doi: 10.15420/aer.2015.28.1. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2016. PMID: 27403292 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of physiological amplitude, duration, and magnitude of ECG T-wave alternans.Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2009 Oct;14(4):366-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-474X.2009.00326.x. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2009. PMID: 19804514 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical