Sustained division of spatial attention to multiple locations within one hemifield
- PMID: 17207932
- DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.12.001
Sustained division of spatial attention to multiple locations within one hemifield
Abstract
Attending to a location in space significantly improves stimulus perception at that location. Everyday experience requires the deployment of attention to multiple objects at different locations. Recent empirical evidence suggests that the "beam" of attention can be divided between non-contiguous areas of the visual field. Whether this is only possible when stimuli are presented in different hemifields and harder, if not impossible, when stimuli are in the same hemifield is an ongoing debate. Here we use an electrophysiological measure of sustained attentional resource allocation (the steady-state visual evoked potential, SSVEP) to address this question. In combination with behavioural data we demonstrate that splitting the attentional "beam" is in principle possible within one hemifield. However, results showed that task performance was in general lower for same-hemifield presentation as opposed to our previous study with different-hemifield presentation [M.M. Müller, P. Malinowski, T. Gruber, S.A. Hillyard, Sustained division of the attentional spotlight, Nature 424 (2003) 309-312]. SSVEP amplitude showed a mixed pattern of results for stimuli presented in the upper versus lower quadrant of the left visual hemifield under conditions of attending to two separated locations. Results are discussed in the light of the bilateral distribution advantage hypothesis and differences in stimulus salience between the upper and lower visual field.
Similar articles
-
Attending to multiple visual streams: interactions between location-based and category-based attentional selection.J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Aug;21(8):1628-41. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21116. J Cogn Neurosci. 2009. PMID: 18823252
-
ERP evidence for cross-modal audiovisual effects of endogenous spatial attention within hemifields.J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Mar;16(2):272-88. doi: 10.1162/089892904322984562. J Cogn Neurosci. 2004. PMID: 15068597 Clinical Trial.
-
Interactions between task difficulty and hemispheric distribution of attended locations: implications for the splitting attention debate.Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Jun;24(1):19-32. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.12.004. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005. PMID: 15922154
-
Splitting the spotlight of visual attention.Neuron. 2004 May 27;42(4):524-6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.05.005. Neuron. 2004. PMID: 15157414 Review.
-
Covert attention effects on spatial resolution.Prog Brain Res. 2009;176:65-86. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17605-7. Prog Brain Res. 2009. PMID: 19733750 Review.
Cited by
-
Split-Brain Babies? Differences in Representation of Bilaterally and Unilaterally Presented Visual Stimuli in Infancy.Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 4;9:2758. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02758. eCollection 2018. Front Psychol. 2019. PMID: 30778325 Free PMC article.
-
Temporal dynamics of divided spatial attention.J Neurophysiol. 2013 May;109(9):2364-73. doi: 10.1152/jn.01051.2012. Epub 2013 Feb 6. J Neurophysiol. 2013. PMID: 23390315 Free PMC article.
-
Competitive effects on steady-state visual evoked potentials with frequencies in- and outside the α band.Exp Brain Res. 2010 Sep;205(4):489-95. doi: 10.1007/s00221-010-2384-2. Epub 2010 Aug 14. Exp Brain Res. 2010. PMID: 20711565 Clinical Trial.
-
The role of visual attention in multiple object tracking: evidence from ERPs.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Jan;72(1):33-52. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.1.33. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010. PMID: 20802834 Free PMC article.
-
When spatial attention cannot be divided: Quadrantic enhancement of early visual processing across task-Relevant and irrelevant locations.Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2024 Jun 20;2:imag-2-00194. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00194. eCollection 2024. Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2024. PMID: 40800287 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources