Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Mar;51(3):864-7.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.00994-06. Epub 2007 Jan 8.

Appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy measured by repeated prevalence surveys

Ina Willemsen  1 , Anneke Groenhuijzen, Diana Bogaers, Arie Stuurman, Peter van Keulen, Jan Kluytmans
Affiliations

Appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy measured by repeated prevalence surveys

Ina Willemsen et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007 Mar.

Abstract

Prudent use of antibiotics is mandatory to control antibiotic resistance. The objective of this study was to determine if prevalence surveys are useful tools to determine the appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy (AMT) and determinants of inappropriate AMT. The study was performed in a 1,350-bed teaching hospital including all medical specialties. Six consecutive 1-day prevalence surveys of in-patients were performed twice yearly from 2001 to 2004. Data on the demographics, infections, and AMT were gathered. The appropriateness of AMT was assessed according to a standardized algorithm based on the local AMT prescription guidelines. On average, 684 patients were included in each survey (total, 4,105). The use of AMT as determined in the prevalence survey corresponded to the annual data from the pharmacy department. Nine hundred thirty-eight (22.9%) of the patients received AMT, and in 351 (37.4%) of these patients AMT was inappropriate. Only 25 (0.6%) patients did not receive AMT, although it was indicated. After multivariate analysis, the use of quinolones was the only statistically significant variable associated with inappropriate use. Prevalence surveys proved to be useful tools to judge the appropriateness of AMT and to identify determinants of inappropriate use. This study shows that in a setting with a low use of AMT, there are few patients who inadvertently do not receive AMT. On the other hand, a substantial number of the patients are treated inappropriate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Trends over time of infections on admission and nosocomial infections in six surveys between 2001 and 2004.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Appropriateness of use of AMT (95% confidence interval) in six surveys between 2001 and 2004.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Emmerson, A., J. Enstone, and M. Kelsey. 1995. The second national prevalence survey of infection in hospitals: methodology. J. Hosp. Infect. 30:7-29. - PubMed
    1. Filius, P. 2005. An additional measure for quantifying antibiotic use in hospitals. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 55:805-808. - PubMed
    1. Gastmeier, P. M. D., D. Sohr, D. Forster, G. Schulgen, M. Schumacher, F. Dascher, and H. Ruden. 2000. Identifying outliers of antibiotic usage in prevalence studies on nosocomial infections. Infect Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 21:324-328. - PubMed
    1. Goossens, H., M. Ferech, R. Vander Stichele, and M. Elseviers. 2005. Outpatient antibiotic use in Europe and association with resistance: a cross-national database study. Lancet 365:579-587. - PubMed
    1. Gyssens, I. C., P. J. van den Broek, B. Kullberg, Y. A. Hekster, and J. W. M. van der Meer. 1992. Optimizing antimicrobial therapy. A method for antimicrobial drug use evaluation. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 30:724-727. - PubMed

Substances