Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2007 Jan;28(1):146-51.

Treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a nationwide assessment of effectiveness

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a nationwide assessment of effectiveness

R T Higashida et al. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007 Jan.

Abstract

Background and purpose: With advances in neuroimaging, unruptured cerebral aneurysms are being diagnosed more frequently. Until 1995, surgical clipping of the aneurysm was the only treatment available. Since then, a less invasive endovascular technique has been found effective in a trial of ruptured aneurysms. No efficacy studies comparing the 2 procedures for unruptured aneurysms exist to guide clinical decisions. The objective of this study was to assess effectiveness and outcomes of endovascular versus neurosurgical treatment for unruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study, using data collected over a 1-year time interval (between 1998 and 2000), from 429 hospitals, in 18 states, and representing 58% of the US population. A total of 2535 treated, unruptured cerebral aneurysm cases were evaluated. The measurements used were effectiveness as measured by hospital discharge outcomes: 1) mortality (in-hospital death), 2) adverse outcomes (death or discharge to a rehabilitation or nursing facility), 3) length of stay, and 4) hospital charges. Univariate analyses compared endovascular versus neurosurgical discharge outcomes. Multivariable models were adjusted for age, sex, region, Medicaid insurance status, year, hospital case volume, comorbidity score, and admission source.

Results: Endovascular treatment was associated with fewer adverse outcomes (6.6% versus 13.2%), decreased mortality (0.9% versus 2.5%), shorter lengths of stay (4.5 versus 7.4 days), and lower hospital charges (42,044 dollars versus 47,567 dollars) compared with neurosurgical treatment (P < .05). After multivariable adjustment, neurosurgical cases had 70% greater odds of an adverse outcome, 30% increased hospital charges, and 80% longer length of stay compared with endovascular cases (P < .05).

Conclusions: The current analysis indicates that endovascular therapy is associated with significantly less morbidity, less mortality, and decreased hospital resource use at discharge, compared with conventional neurosurgical treatment for all unruptured aneurysms. Endovascular therapy, as a treatment alternative to surgical clipping, should be offered as a viable therapeutic option for all patients considering treatment of an unruptured cerebral aneurysm.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Rinkel G, Djibuti M, Algra A, et al. Prevalence and risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review. Stroke 1998;29:251–56 - PubMed
    1. Schievink W. Intracranial aneurysms. N Engl J Med 1997;336:28–40 - PubMed
    1. Horikoshi T, Akiyama I, Yamagata Z, et al. Retrospective analysis of the prevalence of asymptomatic cerebral aneurysm in 4518 patients undergoing magnetic resonance angiography—when does cerebral aneurysm develop? Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2002;42:105–12 - PubMed
    1. Winn HR, Jane JA Sr, Taylor J, et al. Prevalence of asymptomatic incidental aneurysms: review of 4568 arteriograms. J Neurosurg 2002;96 - PubMed
    1. Hop J, Rinkel G, Algra A, et al. Case-fatality rates and functional outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review. Stroke 1997;28:660–64 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms