Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Controlled Clinical Trial
. 2007 Mar-Apr;14(2):198-205.
doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2199. Epub 2007 Jan 9.

Impact on quality of life of a telemedicine system supporting head and neck cancer patients: a controlled trial during the postoperative period at home

Jaap L van den Brink  1 , Peter W Moorman, Maarten F de Boer, Wim C J Hop, Jean F A Pruyn, Carel D A Verwoerd, Jan H van Bemmel
Affiliations
Controlled Clinical Trial

Impact on quality of life of a telemedicine system supporting head and neck cancer patients: a controlled trial during the postoperative period at home

Jaap L van den Brink et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Mar-Apr.

Abstract

Objectives: Telemedicine applications carry the potential to enhance the quality of life of patients, but studies evaluating telemedicine applications are still scarce. The evidence regarding the effectiveness of telemedicine is limited and not yet conclusive. This study investigated whether telemedicine could be beneficial to the quality of life of cancer patients.

Design and measurements: Between 1999 and 2002, we conducted a prospective controlled trial evaluating the effects of a telemedicine application on the quality of life of patients with cancer involving the head and neck, using quality of life questionnaires that covered 22 quality of life parameters. All patients had undergone surgery for head and neck cancer at the Erasmus MC, a tertiary university hospital in The Netherlands. Patients in the intervention group were given access to an electronic health information support system for a period of six weeks, starting at discharge from the hospital.

Results: In total, we included 145 patients in the control group and 39 in the intervention group. At 6 weeks, the end of the intervention, the intervention group had significantly improved QoL in 5 of the 22 studied parameters. Only one of these five quality of life parameters remained significantly different at 12 weeks.

Conclusions: This study adds to the sparse evidence that telemedicine may be beneficial for the quality of life of cancer patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patients’ flow into the various groups during this study. The reasons for not participating or dropping out are also shown. Out of 229 potential patients (all groups), 184 patients were included, of whom 163 completed all three questionnaires.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean level (± 1 SE) for both the control group and the intervention group at T1, T2, and T3 for the five significant QoL parameters. p-values are also shown.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Committee on Cancer Survivorship Improving Care and Quality of Life IoMIn: Maria Hewitt SG, Ellen Stovall, editors. From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivor: Lost in Transition. Washington, D.C: National Academies Press; 2006. - PubMed
    1. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America IoM Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press; 2001.
    1. Mair F, Whitten P. Systematic review of studies of patient satisfaction with telemedicine BMJ 2000;320:1517-1520. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Roine R, Ohinmaa A, Hailey D. Assessing telemedicine: a systematic review of the literature CMAJ 2001;165:765-771. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Field MJ, Grigsby J. Telemedicine and remote patient monitoring JAMA 2002;288:423-425. - PubMed

Publication types