Specificity of serum prostate-specific antigen determination in the Finnish prostate cancer screening trial
- PMID: 17213825
- PMCID: PMC2360217
- DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603522
Specificity of serum prostate-specific antigen determination in the Finnish prostate cancer screening trial
Abstract
Specificity constitutes a component of validity for a screening test. The number of false-positive (FP) results has been regarded as one of major shortcomings in prostate cancer screening. We estimated the specificity of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) determination in prostate cancer screening using data from a randomised, controlled screening trial conducted in Finland with 32 000 men in the screening arm. We calculated the specificity as the proportion of men with negative findings (screen negatives, SN) relative to those with negative and FP results (SN/(SN+FP)). A SN finding was defined as either PSA</=4 ng ml(-1) or PSA 3.0-3.9 ng ml(-1) combined with a negative ancillary test (digital rectal examination, DRE or free/total, F/T PSA ratio). False positives were those with positive screening test followed by a negative diagnostic examination. Of the 30 194 eligible men, 20 794 (69%) attended the first screening round and 1968 (9.5%) had a screen-positive finding. A total of 508 prostate cancers were detected at screening (2.4%). Hence, the number of SN findings was 18 825 and the number of FP results 1358. Specificity was estimated as 0.933 (18 825 out of 20 183) with 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.929-0.936. Specificity decreased with age. Digital rectal examination as ancillary examination had similar or higher specificity than F/T PSA. In the second screening round, specificity was slightly lower (0.912, 95% CI 0.908-0.916). The specificity of PSA screening in the Finnish screening trial is acceptable. Further improvement in specificity could, however, improve acceptability of screening and decrease screening costs.
Figures
References
-
- Ablin RJ, Bronson P, Soanes WA, Vitebsky E (1970) Tissue- and species-specific antigens of normal human prostatic tissue. J Immunol 104: 1329–1339 - PubMed
-
- Allison JE, Tekawa IS, Ransom LJ, Adrain AL (1996) A comparison of fecal occult-blood tests for colorectal-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 334: 155–159 - PubMed
-
- Auvinen A, Alexander FE, de Koning HJ, Miller AB (2002) Should we start population screening for prostate cancer? Randomised trials are still needed. Int J Cancer 97: 377–378 - PubMed
-
- Breslow N, Chan CW, Dhom G, Drury RA, Franks LM, Gellei B, Lee YS, Lundberg S, Sparke B, Sternby NH, Tulinius H (1977) Latent carcinoma of prostate at autopsy in seven areas. Int J Cancer 20: 680–688 - PubMed
-
- Cervix cancer screening (2005) IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention Vol 10 Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous