Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2007 Jan 10;27(2):261-4.
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4906-06.2007.

Comparison of recordings from microelectrode arrays and single electrodes in the visual cortex

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of recordings from microelectrode arrays and single electrodes in the visual cortex

Ryan C Kelly et al. J Neurosci. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Cyberkinetics microelectrode array and example waveforms. A, The array, closeup, and perspective with a penny. B, Examples of sorted waveforms and SNRs from three representative channels and one channel of noise.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Response properties. A, Orientation tuning curves for 16 example neurons in response to a sinusoidal grating drifting in 12 different directions. The grating was fixed at a spatial frequency of 1.3 cycles/degree, temporal frequency of 6.25 Hz, size of 8°, and duration of 1.28 s with 1.5 s between stimuli. B, STRFs generated with reverse correlation of responses to white-noise stimuli for the same 16 neurons.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
SNRs in the four preparations. A, B, Macaque array SNR (A) tended to be lower than single-electrode SNR (B; two-sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov goodness-of-fit hypothesis test, p < 0.0001). C, D, Similarly, cat array SNR (C) was lower than single-electrode SNR (D; p = 0.046). Finally, there was a trend for recordings in cats to have higher SNRs than recordings in the macaques for single electrodes (p = 0.10) and arrays (p < 0.0001). All SNR values were computed from the waveforms over ∼1 h of recording time.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Stability of SNR. Here we show the log (SNR) values for a continuous 29 h recording session from one array implant. The cells here are sorted in decreasing order by average SNR value across time. The plot above shows the average SNR across all cells for each hour (error bars are ±1 SEM).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cavanaugh JR, Bair W, Movshon JA. Nature and interaction of signals from the receptive field center and surround in macaque V1 neurons. J Neurophysiol. 2002;88:2530–2546. - PubMed
    1. Hubel D, Wiesel T. Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. J Physiol (Lond) 1968;195:215–243. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jermakowicz WJ, Chen X, Khaytin I, Zhou Z, Bernard M, Bonds AB, Casagrande VA. Does spike synchrony provide a better code of stimulus angle than average firing rate? J Vis. 2006;6:66a.
    1. Jones JP, Palmer LA. The two-dimensional spatial structure of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. J Neurophysiol. 1987;58:1187–1211. - PubMed
    1. Levick W. Another tungsten microelectrode. Med Biol Eng. 1972;10:510–515. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources