Female liver transplant recipients with the same GFR as male recipients have lower MELD scores--a systematic bias
- PMID: 17217437
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.01666.x
Female liver transplant recipients with the same GFR as male recipients have lower MELD scores--a systematic bias
Abstract
Women have lower glomerular filtration (GFR) than men for the same serum creatinine (Cr) value, not accounted for in model for end-stage liver disease (MELD). We compare male/female Cr, GFR (using MDRD formula) and respective MELD scores in 403 Cr measurements using standard (sCr), O'Leary modified (mCr) and Compensated (cCr) Jaffe and Enzymatic (eCr) in 158 liver disease patients, mCr in 208 liver transplantation (LT) candidates, and EDTA-Cr(51)-GFR in 38 other candidates for LT; considering each female as male, a 'corrected' Cr was derived. MELD scores were calculated for measured and "corrected" Cr in females. Median Cr and GFR in females were lower than males (p < 0.05). Both MDRD and EDTA-Cr(51) GFR were lower in females than males, despite lower Cr values. In females, each MELD score was lower than the corresponding MELD-corrected Cr (p < 0.001) with > or =three-point difference in liver disease patients: 25%[sCr]; 23%[mCr]; 11%[eCr]; and 14%[cCr]. In 65% of female LT candidates, two- or three-point difference was found. Females with liver disease have lower GFR than males for the same Cr value; correcting Cr increases MELD score by two or three points in 65% of female LT candidates. MELD score adjustment in females would ensure equal LT priority by gender.
Similar articles
-
Model for End-Stage Liver Disease: Is Sex-Based Creatinine Correction a Viable Strategy for Black Females?Transplantation. 2015 Nov;99(11):2337-40. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000747. Transplantation. 2015. PMID: 26177085
-
Impact of creatinine values on MELD scores in male and female candidates for liver transplantation.Ann Hepatol. 2013 May-Jun;12(3):434-9. Ann Hepatol. 2013. PMID: 23619260
-
Is the corrected-creatinine model for end-stage liver disease a feasible strategy to adjust gender difference in organ allocation for liver transplantation?Transplantation. 2007 Dec 15;84(11):1406-12. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000282867.92367.d0. Transplantation. 2007. PMID: 18091516
-
Variation in intention-to-treat survival by MELD subtypes: All models created for end-stage liver disease are not equal.J Hepatol. 2025 Feb;82(2):268-276. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2024.08.006. Epub 2024 Aug 22. J Hepatol. 2025. PMID: 39181212
-
[The value of MELD in the allocation of priority for liver transplantation candidates].Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Apr;33(4):330-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2009.04.007. Epub 2009 Jul 23. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010. PMID: 19631411 Review. Spanish.
Cited by
-
Model for end-stage liver disease: end of the first decade.Clin Liver Dis. 2011 Nov;15(4):685-98. doi: 10.1016/j.cld.2011.08.009. Epub 2011 Oct 1. Clin Liver Dis. 2011. PMID: 22032523 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Correcting the sex disparity in MELD-Na.Am J Transplant. 2021 Oct;21(10):3296-3304. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16731. Epub 2021 Jul 12. Am J Transplant. 2021. PMID: 34174151 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of renal function in patients with cirrhosis: where are we now?World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Mar 14;20(10):2533-41. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i10.2533. World J Gastroenterol. 2014. PMID: 24627589 Free PMC article. Review.
-
New Developments in Hepatorenal Syndrome.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Feb;16(2):162-177.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.05.041. Epub 2017 Jun 7. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018. PMID: 28602971 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Serum cystatin C as a predictor of 90-day mortality among patients admitted with complications of cirrhosis.JGH Open. 2021 Apr 7;5(5):607-613. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12543. eCollection 2021 May. JGH Open. 2021. PMID: 34013062 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical