Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2006 Dec;8(12):1062-71.
doi: 10.1593/neo.05832.

Expression and effect of inhibition of the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2C on esophageal adenocarcinoma

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Expression and effect of inhibition of the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2C on esophageal adenocarcinoma

Jules Lin et al. Neoplasia. 2006 Dec.

Abstract

Ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis of cyclins plays a critical role in cell cycle progression and tumorigenesis. We examined the expression of ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2C (UBE2C) during progression from Barrett's metaplasia to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA) and the effects of targeting this enzyme on EA-derived cell lines. Using oligonucleotide microarrays UBE2C expression was elevated in 73% (11 of 15) of EAs relative to Barrett's metaplasia. Tissue microarray showed elevated UBE2C in 70% (7 of 10) of dysplastic samples and in 87% (58 of 67) of tumors relative to metaplastic samples. Transfection of dominant-negative UBE2C into Seg-1 cells decreased proliferation (P = .04) and increased mitotic arrest compared to vector controls (63.5% vs 6.8%; P < .001). Transfection of UBE2C small interfering RNA also caused inhibiton of cell proliferation and distortion of the cell cycle, with maximal increase of G(2) cells (155% of mock cells) at 72 hours and of S-phase cells (308% of mock cells) at 24 hours. Treatment of Seg-1 cells with the proteasome inhibitor MG-262 (1 nM-1 microM) showed decreased proliferation (P = .02). EA-derived cells expressing UBE2C are sensitive to treatment with MG-262 and to silencing of UBE2C, suggesting that patients with EAs overexpressing UBE2C may benefit from agents targeting this ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Oligonucleotide microarray analysis of 46 esophageal samples revealed at least a two-fold overexpression (Y axis) of UBE2C in 11 of 15 (73%) cases of esophageal adenocarcinomas relative to Barrett's metaplasia. BM, Barrett's metaplasia; LGD, low-grade dysplasia; HGD, high-grade dysplasia; EA, esophageal adenocarcinoma. Numbers on X axis labels represent tumor ID.
Figure 2
Figure 2
TMA immunohistochemistry showing (A) intense nuclear staining (arrow) in tumor D48-T, (B) intense staining (arrow) in esophageal adenocarcinoma R35-T, (C) moderate staining (arrow) in Barrett's dysplasia sample P60-BD, and (D) no staining in Barrett's metaplasia sample I93-B. Original magnification, x200. Sections were counterstained with hematoxylin.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) Western blot analysis shows expression of UBE2C (∼ 19 kDa) in esophageal adenocarcinomas S96-T, M48-T, K32T, and P28-T. The Barrett's metaplasia sample M48-B and the normal esophageal sample M48-N express small amounts of UBE2C, whereas there was no UBE2C protein expressed in either the Barrett's dysplasia sample S96-BD or the normal esophageal samples A54-N and D67-N. (B) Western blot analysis of nine esophageal cell lines shows expression of UBE2C (∼ 19 kDa) in the esophageal adenocarcinoma cell lines BA, OE33, Flo-1, Seg-1, and Bic-1, whereas L20-T and H80-T showed smaller amounts of UBE2C protein. The squamous cell line Het-1A and the Barrett's metaplasia-derived S95-B also expressed UBE2C protein. β-Actin expression was used as loading control.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(A) Seg-1 cells, which overexpressed UBE2C, showed a significant decrease in cell proliferation after transfection with the dominant-negative UBE2C when compared to control cultures using the MTT assay. All experiments were repeated in triplicate. (B) Although transfection efficiency was not significantly different between vector controls and dominant-negative UBE2C plasmids in Seg-1 cells, the percentage of cells in the mitotic phase was significantly higher after transfection with the dominant-negative UBE2C. All experiments were repeated in triplicate. (C) Seg-1 cells showed a significant decrease in cell proliferation after treatment with the proteasome inhibitor MG-262 when compared to control cultures using the MTT assay. All experiments were repeated in triplicate (*P < .05, **P < .005).
Figure 5
Figure 5
UBE2C silencing with gene-specific siRNA treatment in Seg-1 cells. (A) Real-time quantitative RT-PCR indicated a potent knockdown of UBE2C mRNA expression, with four to five threshold cycles (Ct) between mock control and siRNA-mediated UBE2C-silencing transfectants. (B) A > 95% reduction of UBE2C mRNA expression was detected at 24 and 48 hours and in both 1.5 x 103 and 2.5 x 103 cells/well transfectants. (C) Western blot analysis of Seg-1 cells treated with UBE2C-specific siRNA at various time periods. The lack of expression in the treated samples indicates complete abrogation of the UBE2C protein.
Figure 6
Figure 6
WST-1 cell proliferation assay. The reduction of cell proliferation in Seg-1 cells treated with siRNA against UBE2C demonstrated a maximal decrease of 44.3% compared to mock control cells. Cell proliferation was decreased in 22.4% and 31.0% of mock controls after the 24-hour and 72-hour treatments, respectively, of siRNA-mediated UBE2C silencing. There was no difference in cell proliferation observed between treated cells and mock cells after 96 hours.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Flow cytometry of cells labeled with PI. (A) Change in cell cycle distribution over time was observed for Seg-1 cells following treatment with siRNA against UBE2C. Maximal G2 cell accumulation was observed 72 hours after treatment with siRNA (155.4% increase compared to mock cells and/or a normal range of cell cycle distribution). Shown also in this figure is that S-phase cell number increased significantly 24 hours after siRNA transfection. S-phase cells were also increased in 72-hour transfectants treated with an additional siRNA transfection at the 48-hour time point (24 hours before harvest of 72-hour transfectants). (B) Cell cycle distributions over time after siRNA treatment against UBE2C.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. King RW, Deshaies RJ, Peters JM, Kirschner MW. How proteolysis drives the cell cycle. Science. 1996;274:1652–1659. - PubMed
    1. Townsley FM, Ruderman JV. Proteolytic ratchets that control progression through mitosis. Trends Cell Biol. 1998;8:238–244. - PubMed
    1. Ciechanover A. The ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic pathway. Cell. 1994;79:13–21. - PubMed
    1. Lin Y, Hwang WC, Basavappa R. Structural and functional analysis of the human mitotic-specific ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme, UbcH10. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:21913–21921. - PubMed
    1. Townsley FM, Aristarkhov A, Beck S, Hershko A, Ruderman JV. Dominant-negative cyclin-selective ubiquitin carrier protein E2-C/UbcH10 blocks cells in metaphase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:2362–2367. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms