Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Jul;28(4):423-32.
doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2006.11.006. Epub 2006 Nov 21.

Costs of recruiting couples to a clinical trial

Affiliations

Costs of recruiting couples to a clinical trial

Georgia Robins Sadler et al. Contemp Clin Trials. 2007 Jul.

Abstract

Multiple barriers contribute to the slow recruitment of participants to research studies, which in turn extends the time required to translate promising scientific discoveries into proven therapeutic interventions. A small but growing literature is developing on the extraordinary costs of recruiting participants to studies, and thereby demonstrating that underestimating the cost of participant recruitment can contribute to these recruitment problems. These recruitment challenges and costs are exacerbated when the participants' study eligibility is determined by relatively narrowly defined illness parameters. Recruitment challenges are further compounded when dyads (two individuals engaged in a sociologically significant relationship, such as husbands and wives, siblings or extended families) must be recruited to an illness-focused study. For these latter groups, there are no data to guide researchers in how to anticipate those participant recruitment costs. This paper describes the staff costs for a variety of strategies used to recruit participants to a randomized supportive care study for couples who were within 18 months of a prostate cancer diagnosis. Pegged to the value of the U.S. dollar for the period, the average cost of staff time was $288 per recruited and enrolled dyad, plus a promised additional $100 incentive for study retention. Within the strategies used, the staff costs per recruited dyad ranged from $152 to $1688. Accrual per strategy ranged from 0 to 107 enrolled couples. When asked for secondary sources of information about the study, many participants reported more than one source of study referral, reflective of the multifaceted recruitment strategies deployed. In spite of innovative, culturally competent, and broad based recruitment methods, attainment of a diverse sample was difficult to accomplish in this study. Having estimates of the actual cost of recruiting dyads to research studies can help investigators prepare realistic study budgets.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Avorn J. Including elderly people in clinical trials: Better information could improve the effectiveness and safety of drug use. BMJ. 1997;315(25 October):1033–1034. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bugeja G, Kumar A, Banerjee A. Exclusion of elderly people from clinical research: a descriptive study of published reports. BMJ. 1997;315(25 October):1059. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shavers V, Lynch C, Bumeister L. Factors that influence African-Americans’ willingness to participate in medical research studies. Cancer. 2001;91(1 supplement):233–236. - PubMed
    1. Mouton C, Harris S, Rovi S, Solorzano P, Johnson M. Barriers to black Women's participation in cancer clinical trials. J Natl Med Assoc. 1997;89(11):721–727. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Green B, Partridge E, Fouad M, Kohler C, Crayton E, et al. African-American attitudes regarding cancer clinical trials and research studies: results from focus group methodology. Ethn Dis. 2000;10(1):76–86. - PubMed

Publication types