Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Jan;56(1):103-128.
doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.07.005.

The interplay of discourse congruence and lexical association during sentence processing: Evidence from ERPs and eye tracking

The interplay of discourse congruence and lexical association during sentence processing: Evidence from ERPs and eye tracking

C Christine Camblin et al. J Mem Lang. 2007 Jan.

Abstract

Five experiments used ERPs and eye tracking to determine the interplay of word-level and discourse-level information during sentence processing. Subjects read sentences that were locally congruent but whose congruence with discourse context was manipulated. Furthermore, critical words in the local sentence were preceded by a prime word that was associated or not. Violations of discourse congruence had early and lingering effects on ERP and eye-tracking measures. This indicates that discourse representations have a rapid effect on lexical semantic processing even in locally congruous texts. In contrast, effects of association were more malleable: Very early effects of associative priming were only robust when the discourse context was absent or not cohesive. Together these results suggest that the global discourse model quickly influences lexical processing in sentences, and that spreading activation from associative priming does not contribute to natural reading in discourse contexts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Difference wave ERPs for nine of the 29 electrode sites. The traces are time-locked to the presentation of the target. The effect of discourse congruence (Incongruent–Congruent) for associated words and unassociated words are shown separately. In this and the following figure, the first row contains frontal electrodes, the second consists of central electrodes, and the final row shows posterior electrodes. Midline electrodes are shown in the center column with electrodes over the left of the scalp in the left column and electrodes over the right of the scalp in the right column. Negative is plotted up.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Difference wave ERPs for nine of the 29 electrode sites. The traces are time-locked to the presentation of the target. The effect of association (Unassociated–Associated) for congruent words and incongruent words are shown separately.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Albrecht JE, O'Brien EJ. Updating a mental mode: Maintaining both local and global coherence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 1993;19:1061–1070.
    1. Anderson JE, Holcomb PJ. Auditory and visual semantic priming using different stimulus onset asynchronies: An event-related brain potential study. Psychophysiology. 1995;32:177–190. - PubMed
    1. Bentin S, McCarthy G, Wood CC. Event-related potentials, lexical decision and semantic priming. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 1985;60:343–355. - PubMed
    1. Braze D, Shankweiler D, Ni W, Palumbo LC. Readers' eye movements distinguished anomalies of form and content. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 2002;31:25–44. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brown C, Hagoort P. The processing nature of the N400: Evidence from masked priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 1993;5:34–44. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources