Acetabular revisions using a cementless oblong cup: five to ten year results
- PMID: 17221262
- PMCID: PMC2269016
- DOI: 10.1007/s00264-006-0307-4
Acetabular revisions using a cementless oblong cup: five to ten year results
Abstract
The purpose of this paper was to evaluate the results of acetabular revisions with the use of an oblong revision cup that is designed with its longitudinal diameter elongated relative to its transverse diameter. Between 1996 and 2001, 62 hips in 60 patients underwent an acetabular revision with the insertion of a LOR acetabular component. Seven hips were lost to follow-up or the patients died; the remaining 55 hips (53 patients) remained in follow-up for an average of 7.2 years (range: 5.0-10.1 years). One socket was revised for aseptic loosening, and another was operated on for a late polyethylene liner dissociation. The average Harris hip score (HHS) improved from 34 to 79. Results were rated as excellent in 16 hips, good in 28, fair in six and poor in three. Radiographic analysis demonstrated an improvement in the average vertical displacement of the hip centre: 49 hips had a well-fixed, bone-ingrown cup and four had a stable fibrous union. For large superolateral acetabular bone deficiencies, this implant facilitated a complex reconstruction without the need for bulk structural acetabular bone grafts, provided good clinical results and showed satisfactory stability at the midterm follow-up.
Le but de cette étude est d’évaluer les résultats des révisions acétabulaires par l’utilisation d’une cupule oblongue. 62 hanches chez 60 patients ont bénéficié de cette révision acétabulaire avec cet insert (LOR). Ces révisions ont été réalisées de 1996 à 2001. 7 hanches ont été perdues de vue ou les patients décédés, 55 hanches (53 patients) ont été suivies en moyenne pendant 7,2 ans (de 5 à 10,1 ans). Une cupule a été révisée pour descellement aseptique et une autre a été reprise pour un débricolage de l’insert en polyéthylène. Le score HHS moyen a été amélioré passant de 34 à 79. Les résultats ont été cotés comme excellents dans 16 hanches, bons dans 28 hanches, moyens dans 6 hanches et mauvais dans 3 hanches. L’analyse radiographique a montré une amélioration du centrage de la hanche, 49 implants sont considérés comme bien en place et bien fixés, 4 hanches ont une fixation fibreuse mais stable. Cet implant facilite les reconstructions difficiles lorsqu’il existe une perte de substance supérieure et latérale du cotyle sans qu’il soit nécessaire de greffer les patients par une allogreffe. Il permet d’avoir de bons résultats et montre une stabilité tout à fait satisfaisante à moyen terme.
Figures
Similar articles
-
[Limits in cementless hip revision total hip arthroplasty. Midterm experience with an oblong revision cup].Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2003 Mar-Apr;141(2):182-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-38652. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2003. PMID: 12695955 German.
-
[Oblong acetabular cup, type TC, for revision total hip arthroplasty].Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2012;79(6):506-11. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2012. PMID: 23286682 Czech.
-
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Cementless Cup Supporter and Iliac Autograft: A Minimum of 15-Year Follow-Up.J Arthroplasty. 2017 Nov;32(11):3495-3501. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.06.026. Epub 2017 Jun 20. J Arthroplasty. 2017. PMID: 28697865
-
[Oblong implants for revision total hip arthroplasty].Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2009 Dec;76(6):462-72. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2009. PMID: 20067693 Czech.
-
[Reconstruction of severe acetabular bone defects using Burch-Schneider cage].Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2006 Jun;73(3):157-63. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2006. PMID: 16846560 Czech.
Cited by
-
Protrusion of a ceramic femoral head through the acetabular metallic cup in total-hip arthroplasty: A case report.Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jun 12;99(24):e20469. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020469. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020. PMID: 32541468 Free PMC article.
-
Satisfying outcomes scores and survivorship achieved with impaction grafting for revision THA in young patients.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Dec;473(12):3867-75. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4293-y. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015. PMID: 25894808 Free PMC article.
-
[Comparison of different cup revision systems].Orthopade. 2009 Aug;38(8):704-10. doi: 10.1007/s00132-009-1429-3. Orthopade. 2009. PMID: 19693623 Review. German.
-
[Acetabular revision surgery with the oblong revision cup : clinical and radiological results of 217 cases].Orthopade. 2010 May;39(5):503-11. doi: 10.1007/s00132-009-1527-2. Orthopade. 2010. PMID: 19838666 German.
-
Deeper Central Reaming May Enhance Initial Acetabular Shell Fixation.Arthroplast Today. 2020 Jun 8;6(3):343-349. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2020.03.012. eCollection 2020 Sep. Arthroplast Today. 2020. PMID: 32548228 Free PMC article.
References
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1097/00003086-200002000-00019', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200002000-00019'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '10693562', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10693562/'}]}
- Berry DJ, Sutherland CJ, Trousdale RT, Colwell CW Jr, Chandler HP, Hayres D, Yashar AA (2000) Bilobed oblong porous coated acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 371:154–160 - PubMed
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1097/00003086-199904000-00019', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199904000-00019'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '10212607', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10212607/'}]}
- Chareancholvanich K, Tanchuling A, Seki T, Gustilo RB (1999) Cementless acetabular revision for aseptic failure of cemented hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 361:140–149 - PubMed
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '10682728', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10682728/'}]}
- Chen WM, Engh CA Jr, Hopper RH, McAuley JP, Engh CA (2000) Acetabular revision with use of a bilobed component inserted without cement in patients who have acetabular bone-stock deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82-A:197–206 - PubMed
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1016/S0883-5403(00)90999-9', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-5403(00)90999-9'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '10654456', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10654456/'}]}
- Dearborn JT, Harris WH (2000) Acetabular revision arthroplasty using so-called jumbo cementless components: an average 7-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 15:8–15 - PubMed
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1016/S0883-5403(98)80012-0', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-5403(98)80012-0'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '9741445', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9741445/'}]}
- DeBoer DK, Christie MJ (1998) Reconstruction of the deficient acetabulum with an oblong prosthesis: three-to seven-year results. J Arthroplasty 13:674–680 - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical