Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy
- PMID: 17222317
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.01054.x
Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy
Abstract
Background and aims: Both advancing age and male gender are known predictors of adenomas and large adenomas at colonoscopy. However, the importance of endoscopist compared with both age and gender as predictors of adenomas is not known. In this study, we assessed the adenoma detection rates of nine endoscopists performing colonoscopy and the effects of endoscopist on adenoma detection compared with the established predictors of advancing age and male gender.
Methods: Consecutive colonoscopy reports by nine attending gastroenterologists at Indiana University Hospital between January 1999 and January 2004 were obtained. Patients with indications for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), inherited colon cancer syndromes, or who were referred for polypectomy were excluded.
Results: There were 10,034 included colonoscopies. The overall mean age (yr) +/- SD for the entire cohort was 56.0 +/- 13.5, range 14-93 yr. Multivariate analysis indicated that both advancing age and male gender were powerful predictors of adenomas, both for the overall cohort and in those >or=50 of age (P<or= 0.0001). The prevalence of adenomas increased from 14.6% at age 30 to 35.2% at age 70. Men had more adenomas than women (24.4%vs 16.6%, P<or= 0.0001). Among patients >or=50 yr of age, the range of detection of at least one adenoma per colonoscopy by nine colonoscopists was 15.5-41.1%, at least two adenomas was 4.9-20.0%, at least three adenomas was 0.8-10.8%, and at least one adenoma >or=1.0 cm was 1.7-6.2%, and the range of adenomas detected per colonoscopy was 0.21-0.86. Differences between endoscopists were significant (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: Who performs the procedure can be more important than age and gender in predicting adenomas at colonoscopy. Our results underscore the need to measure adenoma detection rates in the continuous quality improvement process and to report them to endoscopists. Additional data are needed to determine whether corrective measures can reduce variation in adenoma detection rates.
Comment in
-
"Demand the data! Your patients will ask and your practice will need it".Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Apr;102(4):862-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01050.x. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007. PMID: 17397411
-
[Colonoscopy: the endoscopist as a risk factor].Z Gastroenterol. 2008 Jun;46(6):631-2. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1027386. Z Gastroenterol. 2008. PMID: 18537091 German. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Factors Associated With Shorter Colonoscopy Surveillance Intervals for Patients With Low-Risk Colorectal Adenomas and Effects on Outcome.Gastroenterology. 2017 Jun;152(8):1933-1943.e5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.02.010. Epub 2017 Feb 20. Gastroenterology. 2017. PMID: 28219690 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Advanced adenoma detection rate is independent of nonadvanced adenoma detection rate.Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Aug;108(8):1286-92. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.149. Epub 2013 May 28. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013. PMID: 23711625
-
Impact of a quarterly report card on colonoscopy quality measures.Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Jun;77(6):925-31. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.01.012. Epub 2013 Mar 6. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013. PMID: 23472996
-
Colonoscopy: a review of its yield for cancers and adenomas by indication.Am J Gastroenterol. 1995 Mar;90(3):353-65. Am J Gastroenterol. 1995. PMID: 7872270 Review.
-
Interval cancers after colonoscopy-insights and recommendations.Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Sep;9(9):550-4. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2012.136. Epub 2012 Aug 21. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012. PMID: 22907162 Review.
Cited by
-
Adenoma detection in patients undergoing a comprehensive colonoscopy screening.Cancer Med. 2013 Jun;2(3):391-402. doi: 10.1002/cam4.73. Epub 2013 Apr 20. Cancer Med. 2013. PMID: 23930215 Free PMC article.
-
No Interval Cancers in Endoscopic Practice.Curr Health Sci J. 2019 Jan-Mar;45(1):5-18. doi: 10.12865/CHSJ.45.01.01. Epub 2019 Mar 31. Curr Health Sci J. 2019. PMID: 31297257 Free PMC article.
-
Importance of endoscopist quality metrics for findings at surveillance colonoscopy: The detection-surveillance paradox.United European Gastroenterol J. 2018 May;6(4):622-629. doi: 10.1177/2050640617745458. Epub 2017 Nov 24. United European Gastroenterol J. 2018. PMID: 29881618 Free PMC article.
-
Achieving competence in colonoscopy: Milestones and the need for a new endoscopic curriculum in gastroenterology training.World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Dec 10;7(18):1279-86. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i18.1279. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015. PMID: 26675559 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Editorial: The Name Game: Circumventing Quality Metrics by Categorizing Incomplete Colonoscopy as Sigmoidoscopy.Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Oct;112(10):1553-1555. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.258. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017. PMID: 28978953
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical