Corticostriatal transformations in the primate somatosensory system. Projections from physiologically mapped body-part representations
- PMID: 1722244
- DOI: 10.1152/jn.1991.66.4.1249
Corticostriatal transformations in the primate somatosensory system. Projections from physiologically mapped body-part representations
Abstract
1. The basal ganglia of primates receive somatosensory input carried largely by corticostriatal fibers. To determine whether map-transformations occur in this corticostriatal system, we investigated how electrophysiologically defined regions of the primary somatosensory cortex (SI) project to the striatum in the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus). Receptive fields in the hand, mouth, and foot representations of cortical areas 3a, 3b, and 1 were mapped by multiunit recording; and small volumes of distinguishable anterograde tracers were injected into different body-part representations in single SI areas. 2. Analysis of labeled projections established that at least four types of systematic remapping occur in the primate corticostriatal system. 1) An area of cortex representing a single body part sends fibers that diverge to innervate multiple regions in the putamen, forming branching, patchy fields that are densest in the lateral putamen. The fields do not form elongated cylindrical forms; rather, they are nearly as extended mediolaterally as they are rostrocaudally. 2) Cortical regions representing hand, mouth, and foot send globally somatotopic, nonoverlapping projections to the putamen, but regions with closely related representations (such as those of the thumb and 5th finger in area 3b) send convergent, overlapping corticostriatal projections. The overlap is fairly precise in the caudal putamen, but in the rostral putamen the densest zones of the projections do not overlap. 3) Regions representing homologous body parts in different SI cortical areas send projections that converge in the putamen. This was true of paired projections from areas 3a and 3b, and from areas 3b and 1. Thus corticostriatal inputs representing distinct somatosensory submodalities can project to the same local regions within the striatum. Convergence is not always complete, however: in the rostral putamen of two cases comparing projections from areas 3a and 1, the densest zones of the projections did not overlap. 4) All projections from SI avoid striosomes and innervate discrete zones within the matrix. 3. These experiments demonstrate that the somatosensory representations of the body are reorganized as they are projected from SI to the somatosensory sector of the primate putamen. This remapping suggests that the striatal representation of the body may be functionally distinct from that of each area of SI. The patchy projections may provide a basis for redistribution of somatosensory information to discrete output systems in the basal ganglia. Transformations in the corticostriatal system could thus be designed for modulating different movement-related programs.
Similar articles
-
Two input systems for body representations in the primate striatal matrix: experimental evidence in the squirrel monkey.J Neurosci. 1993 Mar;13(3):1120-37. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.13-03-01120.1993. J Neurosci. 1993. PMID: 7680067 Free PMC article.
-
Motor and somatosensory corticostriatal projection magnifications in the squirrel monkey.J Neurophysiol. 1995 Dec;74(6):2638-48. doi: 10.1152/jn.1995.74.6.2638. J Neurophysiol. 1995. PMID: 8747221
-
Distributed but convergent ordering of corticostriatal projections: analysis of the frontal eye field and the supplementary eye field in the macaque monkey.J Neurosci. 1992 Nov;12(11):4468-88. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.12-11-04468.1992. J Neurosci. 1992. PMID: 1279139 Free PMC article.
-
[Cortico-basal ganglia circuits--parallel closed loops and convergent/divergent connections].Brain Nerve. 2009 Apr;61(4):351-9. Brain Nerve. 2009. PMID: 19378804 Review. Japanese.
-
Striatal tissue transplantation in non-human primates.Prog Brain Res. 2000;127:381-404. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6123(00)27018-0. Prog Brain Res. 2000. PMID: 11142037 Review.
Cited by
-
Relationship between the corticostriatal terminals from areas 9 and 46, and those from area 8A, dorsal and rostral premotor cortex and area 24c: an anatomical substrate for cognition to action.Eur J Neurosci. 2007 Oct;26(7):2005-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05825.x. Epub 2007 Sep 24. Eur J Neurosci. 2007. PMID: 17892479 Free PMC article.
-
Spatial reorganization of putaminal dopamine D2-like receptors in cranial and hand dystonia.PLoS One. 2014 Feb 10;9(2):e88121. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088121. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 24520350 Free PMC article.
-
The mouse cortico-striatal projectome.Nat Neurosci. 2016 Aug;19(8):1100-14. doi: 10.1038/nn.4332. Epub 2016 Jun 20. Nat Neurosci. 2016. PMID: 27322419 Free PMC article.
-
Evidence for differential cortical input to direct pathway versus indirect pathway striatal projection neurons in rats.J Neurosci. 2004 Sep 22;24(38):8289-99. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1990-04.2004. J Neurosci. 2004. PMID: 15385612 Free PMC article.
-
Corticostriatal projections from rat barrel cortex have an anisotropic organization that correlates with vibrissal whisking behavior.J Neurosci. 1999 Dec 15;19(24):10908-22. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-24-10908.1999. J Neurosci. 1999. PMID: 10594072 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources