Relational processing and working memory capacity in comprehension of relative clause sentences
- PMID: 17225512
- DOI: 10.3758/bf03193275
Relational processing and working memory capacity in comprehension of relative clause sentences
Abstract
Previous research has indicated that the cognitive load imposed by tasks in various content domains increases with the complexity of the relational information processed. Sentence comprehension entails processing noun-verb relations to determine who did what to whom. The difficulty of object-extracted relative clause sentences might stem from the complex noun-verb relations they entail. Across three studies, participants read 16 types of object- and subject-extracted relative clause sentences at their own pace and then responded to a comprehension question for each sentence. Relational processing was assessed using a premise integration task or a Latin square task. These tasks predicted comprehension of object-relatives before and after controlling for subject-relatives. Working memory (WM) capacity was assessed using reading span or forward and backward digit span tests. WM tasks predicted comprehension of object-relatives before but not after controlling for subject-relatives. Comprehension of object-relatives relied more heavily on a domain-general capacity to process complex relations than on WM capacity.
Similar articles
-
Processing Italian relative clauses: working memory span and word order effects on RTs.J Gen Psychol. 2009 Oct;136(4):387-406. doi: 10.1080/00221300903266671. J Gen Psychol. 2009. PMID: 19943612
-
Chinese subject-relative clauses are more difficult to process than the object-relative clauses.Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Sep;129(1):61-5. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.04.005. Epub 2008 Jun 6. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008. PMID: 18538740
-
Canonical word order and interference-based integration costs during sentence comprehension: the case of Spanish subject- and object-relative clauses.Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(11):2108-28. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.674951. Epub 2012 Apr 23. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012. PMID: 22524672
-
Processing capacity defined by relational complexity: implications for comparative, developmental, and cognitive psychology.Behav Brain Sci. 1998 Dec;21(6):803-31; discussion 831-64. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x98001769. Behav Brain Sci. 1998. PMID: 10191879 Review.
-
Meaning through syntax: language comprehension and the reduced relative clause construction.Psychol Rev. 2003 Jul;110(3):490-525. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.110.3.490. Psychol Rev. 2003. PMID: 12885112 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Listening under difficult conditions: An activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.Hum Brain Mapp. 2018 Jul;39(7):2695-2709. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24031. Epub 2018 Mar 13. Hum Brain Mapp. 2018. PMID: 29536592 Free PMC article.
-
Resolving Conflicts Between Syntax and Plausibility in Sentence Comprehension.Adv Cogn Psychol. 2017 Mar 31;13(1):11-27. doi: 10.5709/acp-0203-8. eCollection 2017. Adv Cogn Psychol. 2017. PMID: 28458748 Free PMC article.
-
Belief-based and analytic processing in transitive inference depends on premise integration difficulty.Mem Cognit. 2010 Oct;38(7):928-40. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.7.928. Mem Cognit. 2010. PMID: 20921105
-
Clitic pronouns reveal the time course of processing gender and number in a second language.Neuropsychologia. 2014 Sep;62:11-25. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.07.002. Epub 2014 Jul 15. Neuropsychologia. 2014. PMID: 25036762 Free PMC article.
-
Three-year-olds' theories of mind are symbolic but of low complexity.Front Psychol. 2014 Jun 30;5:682. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00682. eCollection 2014. Front Psychol. 2014. PMID: 25071652 Free PMC article. No abstract available.