No intra-locus sexual conflict over reproductive fitness or ageing in field crickets
- PMID: 17225859
- PMCID: PMC1764717
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000155
No intra-locus sexual conflict over reproductive fitness or ageing in field crickets
Abstract
Differences in the ways in which males and females maximize evolutionary fitness can lead to intra-locus sexual conflict in which genes delivering fitness benefits to one sex are costly when expressed in the other. Trade-offs between current reproductive effort and future reproduction and survival are fundamental to the evolutionary biology of ageing. This leads to the prediction that sex differences in the optimization of age-dependent reproductive effort may generate intra-locus sexual conflict over ageing rates. Here we test for intra-locus sexual conflict over age-dependent reproductive effort and longevity in the black field cricket, Teleogryllus commodus. Using a half-sib breeding design, we show that the most important components of male and female reproductive effort (male calling effort and the number of eggs laid by females) were positively genetically correlated, especially in early adulthood. However, the genetic relationships between longevity and reproductive effort were different for males and females, leading to low genetic covariation between male and female longevity. The apparent absence of intra-locus sexual conflict over ageing suggests that male and female longevity can evolve largely independently of one another.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures



Similar articles
-
Artificial selection on male longevity influences age-dependent reproductive effort in the black field cricket Teleogryllus commodus.Am Nat. 2006 Sep;168(3):E72-86. doi: 10.1086/506918. Epub 2006 Aug 10. Am Nat. 2006. PMID: 16947102
-
Sexual dimorphism in life history: age, survival, and reproduction in male and female field crickets Teleogryllus commodus under seminatural conditions.Am Nat. 2009 Jun;173(6):792-802. doi: 10.1086/598486. Am Nat. 2009. PMID: 19374505
-
Understanding the link between sexual selection, sexual conflict and aging using crickets as a model.Exp Gerontol. 2015 Nov;71:4-13. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2015.06.017. Epub 2015 Jul 3. Exp Gerontol. 2015. PMID: 26150061
-
Sexual conflict and speciation.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1998 Feb 28;353(1366):261-74. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1998.0208. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1998. PMID: 9533125 Free PMC article. Review.
-
An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2008 May;83(2):151-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2008.00037.x. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2008. PMID: 18429767 Review.
Cited by
-
Experimentally induced intrasexual mating competition and sex-specific evolution in female and male nematodes.J Evol Biol. 2020 Dec;33(12):1677-1688. doi: 10.1111/jeb.13706. Epub 2020 Oct 1. J Evol Biol. 2020. PMID: 32945028 Free PMC article.
-
Cross-generational comparison of reproductive success in recently caught strains of Drosophila melanogaster.BMC Evol Biol. 2017 Feb 6;17(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12862-017-0887-1. BMC Evol Biol. 2017. PMID: 28166714 Free PMC article.
-
Sexes suffer from suboptimal lifespan because of genetic conflict in a seed beetle.Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Oct 22;279(1745):4296-302. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.1345. Epub 2012 Aug 22. Proc Biol Sci. 2012. PMID: 22915670 Free PMC article.
-
Cross-sex genetic correlation does not extend to sexual size dimorphism in spiders.Naturwissenschaften. 2017 Dec 5;105(1-2):1. doi: 10.1007/s00114-017-1529-6. Naturwissenschaften. 2017. PMID: 29209956
-
Age-dependent female responses to a male ejaculate signal alter demographic opportunities for selection.Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Sep 7;280(1766):20130428. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.0428. Print 2013 Sep 7. Proc Biol Sci. 2013. PMID: 23843383 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Pizzari T, Snook RR. Perspective: Sexual conflict and sexual selection: Chasing away paradigm shifts. Evolution. 2003;57:1223–1236. - PubMed
-
- Arnqvist G, Rowe L. Sexual conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2005.
-
- Holland B, Rice WR. Chase-away selection: antagonistic seduction versus resistance. Evolution. 1998;52:1–7. - PubMed
-
- Rice WR, Chippindale AK. Intersexual ontogenetic conflict. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 2001;14:685–693.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical