Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Jan 17;2(1):e155.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000155.

No intra-locus sexual conflict over reproductive fitness or ageing in field crickets

Affiliations

No intra-locus sexual conflict over reproductive fitness or ageing in field crickets

Felix Zajitschek et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Differences in the ways in which males and females maximize evolutionary fitness can lead to intra-locus sexual conflict in which genes delivering fitness benefits to one sex are costly when expressed in the other. Trade-offs between current reproductive effort and future reproduction and survival are fundamental to the evolutionary biology of ageing. This leads to the prediction that sex differences in the optimization of age-dependent reproductive effort may generate intra-locus sexual conflict over ageing rates. Here we test for intra-locus sexual conflict over age-dependent reproductive effort and longevity in the black field cricket, Teleogryllus commodus. Using a half-sib breeding design, we show that the most important components of male and female reproductive effort (male calling effort and the number of eggs laid by females) were positively genetically correlated, especially in early adulthood. However, the genetic relationships between longevity and reproductive effort were different for males and females, leading to low genetic covariation between male and female longevity. The apparent absence of intra-locus sexual conflict over ageing suggests that male and female longevity can evolve largely independently of one another.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Inter-sexual genetic correlations between (a) male mean calling effort and female mean fecundity and (b) male and female longevity.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Genetic correlation between male longevity and mean calling effort. Genetic correlations are illustrated as breeding values of the 52 sires for the two traits from a bivariate model.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Genetic correlation between female longevity and mean fecundity. Genetic correlations are illustrated as breeding values of the 52 sires for the two traits from a bivariate model.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pizzari T, Snook RR. Perspective: Sexual conflict and sexual selection: Chasing away paradigm shifts. Evolution. 2003;57:1223–1236. - PubMed
    1. Arnqvist G, Rowe L. Sexual conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2005.
    1. Tregenza T, Wedell N, Chapman T. Introduction. Sexual conflict: a new paradigm? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences. 2006;361:229–234. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Holland B, Rice WR. Chase-away selection: antagonistic seduction versus resistance. Evolution. 1998;52:1–7. - PubMed
    1. Rice WR, Chippindale AK. Intersexual ontogenetic conflict. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 2001;14:685–693.

Publication types