Stimulation programs for pediatric drug research--do children really benefit?
- PMID: 17225950
- PMCID: PMC1914295
- DOI: 10.1007/s00431-006-0381-z
Stimulation programs for pediatric drug research--do children really benefit?
Abstract
Most drugs that are currently prescribed in pediatrics have not been tested in children. Pediatric drug studies are stimulated in the USA by the pediatric exclusivity provision under the Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act (FDAMA) that grants patent extensions when pediatric labeling is provided. We investigated the effectiveness of these programs in stimulating drug research in children, thereby increasing the evidence for safe and effective drug use in the pediatric population. All drugs granted pediatric exclusivity under the FDAMA were analyzed by studying the relevant summaries of medical and clinical pharmacology reviews of the pediatric studies or, if these were unavailable, the labeling information as provided by the manufacturer. A systematic search of the literature was performed to identify drug utilization patterns in children. From July 1998 to August 2006, 135 drug entities were granted pediatric exclusivity. Most frequent drug groups were anti-depressants and mood stabilizers, ACE inhibitors, lipid-lowering preparations, HIV antivirals, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory and anti-rheumatic drugs. The distribution of the different drugs closely matched the distribution of these drugs over the adult market, and not the drug utilization by children. Many drug studies in children have been performed since the introduction of the FDAMA. However, children infrequently use the drugs granted pediatric exclusivity. The priorities for pediatric drug research should be set by the need of the patients, not by market considerations.
Similar articles
-
Patent extension policy for paediatric indications: an evaluation of the impact within three drug classes in a state Medicaid programme.Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2011 May 1;9(3):171-81. doi: 10.2165/11539060-000000000-00000. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2011. PMID: 21506623
-
The Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act of 2002: the rise of the voluntary incentive structure and congressional refusal to require pediatric testing.Harvard J Legis. 2003 Winter;40(1):133-93. Harvard J Legis. 2003. PMID: 16594116
-
Safety monitoring of drugs granted exclusivity under the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act: what the FDA has learned.Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Aug;82(2):133-4. doi: 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100285. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007. PMID: 17632537
-
The economics of pediatric formulation development for off-patent drugs.Clin Ther. 2008 Nov;30(11):2133-45. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.11.019. Clin Ther. 2008. PMID: 19108801 Review.
-
Pediatric exclusivity: evolving legislation and novel complexities within pediatric therapeutic development.Ann Pharmacother. 2014 Mar;48(3):369-79. doi: 10.1177/1060028013514031. Epub 2013 Dec 5. Ann Pharmacother. 2014. PMID: 24311725 Review.
Cited by
-
Drug versus placebo randomized controlled trials in neonates: A review of ClinicalTrials.gov registry.PLoS One. 2017 Feb 13;12(2):e0171760. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171760. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28192509 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of pediatric clinical drug trials for neuropsychiatric conditions.Pediatrics. 2013 Jun;131(6):1125-31. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-2694. Epub 2013 May 6. Pediatrics. 2013. PMID: 23650305 Free PMC article.
-
Placebo-controlled trials in pediatrics and the child's best interest.Ital J Pediatr. 2015 Feb 15;41:11. doi: 10.1186/s13052-015-0118-6. Ital J Pediatr. 2015. PMID: 25887736 Free PMC article.
-
Safety of medical interventions in children versus adults.Pediatrics. 2014 Mar;133(3):e666-73. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-3128. Epub 2014 Feb 24. Pediatrics. 2014. PMID: 24567023 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Status of the pediatric clinical trials enterprise: an analysis of the US ClinicalTrials.gov registry.Pediatrics. 2012 Nov;130(5):e1269-77. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-3565. Epub 2012 Oct 1. Pediatrics. 2012. PMID: 23027172 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Arlett P (2005) Proposed regulation on medicinal products for paediatric use. Overview and explanation of the proposal. http://pharmacos.eudra.org/F2/Paediatrics/docs/overview%20and%20explanat... (accessed July 27, 2005)
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16942-0', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(04)16942-0'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '15337409', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15337409/'}]}
- Caldwell PH, Murphy SB, Butow PN, Craig JC (2004) Clinical trials in children. Lancet 364:803–811 - PubMed
-
- Commission of the European communities (2004) Proposal for a regulation of the European parliament and of the council on medicinal products for paediatric use and amending Regulation (EEC) No 1768/92, Directive 2001/83/EC and Regulation (EC) No 726/2004, Brussels
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1007/s00228-002-0511-0', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-002-0511-0'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '12451425', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12451425/'}]}
- Ceci A, Felisi M, Catapano M, Baiardi P, Cipollina L, Ravera S, Bagnulo S, Reggio S, Rondini G (2002) Medicines for children licensed by the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 58:495–500 - PubMed
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PMC', 'value': 'PMC1720896', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1720896/'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '10325794', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10325794/'}]}
- Conroy S, McIntyre J, Choonara I (1999) Unlicensed and off label drug use in neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 80: F142-F144 - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous