Porcine transfer study: virtual reality simulator training compared with porcine training in endovascular novices
- PMID: 17225971
- DOI: 10.1007/s00270-006-0161-1
Porcine transfer study: virtual reality simulator training compared with porcine training in endovascular novices
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the learning of endovascular interventional skills by training on pig models versus virtual reality simulators.
Methods: Twelve endovascular novices participated in a study consisting of a pig laboratory (P-Lab) and a virtual reality laboratory (VR-Lab). Subjects were stratified by experience and randomized into four training groups. Following 1 hr of didactic instruction, all attempted an iliac artery stenosis (IAS) revascularization in both laboratories. Onsite proctors evaluated performances using task-specific checklists and global rating scales, yielding a Total Score. Participants completed two training sessions of 3 hr each, using their group's assigned method (P-Lab x 2, P-Lab + VR-Lab, VR-Lab + P-Lab, or VR-Lab x 2) and were re-evaluated in both laboratories. A panel of two highly experienced interventional radiologists performed assessments from video recordings. ANCOVA analysis of Total Score against years of surgical, interventional radiology (IR) experience and cumulative number of P-Lab or VR-Lab sessions was conducted. Inter-rater reliability (IRR) was determined by comparing proctored scores with the video assessors in only the VR-Lab.
Results: VR-Lab sessions improved the VR-Lab Total Score (beta = 3.029, p = 0.0015) and P-Lab Total Score (beta = 1.814, p = 0.0452). P-Lab sessions increased the P-Lab Total Score (beta = 4.074, p < 0.0001) but had no effect on the VR-Lab Total Score. In the general statistical model, both P-Lab sessions (beta = 2.552, p = 0.0010) and VR-Lab sessions (beta = 2.435, p = 0.0032) significantly improved Total Score. Neither previous surgical experience nor IR experience predicted Total Score. VR-Lab scores were consistently higher than the P-Lab scores (Delta = 6.659, p < 0.0001). VR-Lab IRR was substantial (r = 0.649, p < 0.0008).
Conclusions: Endovascular skills learned in the virtual environment may be transferable to the real catheterization laboratory as modeled in the P-Lab.
Similar articles
-
Identification of skills common to renal and iliac endovascular procedures performed on a virtual reality simulator.Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007 May;33(5):525-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.12.022. Epub 2007 Feb 7. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007. PMID: 17291792 Clinical Trial.
-
Endovascular training with animals versus virtual reality systems: an economic analysis.J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008 Feb;19(2 Pt 1):233-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2007.09.004. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008. PMID: 18341955
-
Virtual reality simulation training can improve inexperienced surgeons' endovascular skills.Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006 Jun;31(6):588-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.11.009. Epub 2006 Jan 4. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006. PMID: 16387517
-
Endovascular skills training and assessment.J Vasc Surg. 2007 Nov;46(5):1055-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.05.041. J Vasc Surg. 2007. PMID: 17980294 Review.
-
Simulators in catheter-based interventional radiology: training or computer games?Clin Radiol. 2006 Jul;61(7):556-61. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2006.01.013. Clin Radiol. 2006. PMID: 16784940 Review.
Cited by
-
Can silicone models replace animal models in hands-on training for endovascular stroke therapy?Interv Neuroradiol. 2019 Aug;25(4):397-402. doi: 10.1177/1591019919833843. Epub 2019 Mar 21. Interv Neuroradiol. 2019. PMID: 30895839 Free PMC article.
-
Animal model of a bovine pericardial patch for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms: step by step.J Vasc Bras. 2025 Jun 13;24:e20240182. doi: 10.1590/1677-5449.202401822. eCollection 2025. J Vasc Bras. 2025. PMID: 40557052 Free PMC article.
-
The role of a simulator-based course in coronary angiography on performance in real life cath lab.BMC Med Educ. 2014 Mar 12;14:49. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-49. BMC Med Educ. 2014. PMID: 24621310 Free PMC article.
-
Prospective, randomised and blinded comparison of proficiency-based progression full-physics virtual reality simulator training versus invasive vascular experience for learning carotid artery angiography by very experienced operators.BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2016 Feb 8;2(1):1-5. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2015-000090. eCollection 2016. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2016. PMID: 35516451 Free PMC article.
-
Simulation Training Methods in Neurological Surgery.Asian J Neurosurg. 2019 Apr-Jun;14(2):364-370. doi: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_269_18. Asian J Neurosurg. 2019. PMID: 31143248 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous