Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2007 Aug;454(5):805-19.
doi: 10.1007/s00424-006-0194-y. Epub 2007 Jan 17.

Phototransduction in mouse rods and cones

Affiliations
Review

Phototransduction in mouse rods and cones

Yingbin Fu et al. Pflugers Arch. 2007 Aug.

Abstract

Phototransduction is the process by which light triggers an electrical signal in a photoreceptor cell. Image-forming vision in vertebrates is mediated by two types of photoreceptors: the rods and the cones. In this review, we provide a summary of the success in which the mouse has served as a vertebrate model for studying rod phototransduction, with respect to both the activation and termination steps. Cones are still not as well-understood as rods partly because it is difficult to work with mouse cones due to their scarcity and fragility. The situation may change, however.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Form of the single-photon response from knockout mouse rods with deficient R* termination on fast (a) and slow (b) timescales. Flashes were delivered at t=0. Figure was kindly supplied by Dr. M. E. Burns
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Schematic on the termination G*-PDE*. Gα*-GTP binds to PDEγ and activates PDE. The deactivation of Gα*-GTP is accelerated by the GAP complex, R9AP-RGS9-1-Gβ5L, in which RGS9-1 facilitates the hydrolysis of the bound GTP to GDP, leading to the reformation of the inactive heterotrimeric Gα-GDP-Gβγ and inactive PDE. An asterisk denotes the active state. This step was found to be the rate-limiting step of rod recovery [56]
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Flash responses of mouse cone photoreceptors from different genotypes. a Comparison of the average response of S-cones to 361-nm flashes and M-cones to 510-nm flashes. b Comparison of the average flash responses to 361-nm flashes of wild-type S-cones, gnat1−/− S-cones, Nrl−/− cones, and rods recorded under the same “OS out” conditions. Each trace is scaled to unity at its peak. Data from Fig. 4e,f of [67]. Reproduced from The Journal of General Physiology, 2006, 127: 359–374. Copyright 2006 The Rockefeller University Press

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Baylor DA, Lamb TD, Yau KW. The membrane current of single rod outer segments. J Physiol. 1979;288:589–611. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carter-Dawson LD, LaVail MM. Rods and cones in the mouse retina. I. Structural analysis using light and electron microscopy. J Comp Neurol. 1979;188:245–262. - PubMed
    1. Lem J, Krasnoperova NV, Calvert PD, Kosaras B, Cameron DA, Nicolo M, Makino CL, Sidman RL. Morphological, physiological, and biochemical changes in rhodopsin knockout mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:736–741. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Humphries MM, Rancourt D, Farrar GJ, Kenna P, Hazel M, Bush RA, Sieving PA, Sheils DM, McNally N, Creighton P, et al. Retinopathy induced in mice by targeted disruption of the rhodopsin gene. Nat Genet. 1997;15:216–219. - PubMed
    1. Harosi FI. Absorption spectra and linear dichroism of some amphibian photoreceptors. J Gen Physiol. 1975;66:357–382. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources